Reinforcement Learning Your Way: Agent Characterization through Policy Regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The increased complexity of state-of-the-art reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms have resulted in an opacity that inhibits explainability and understanding. This has led to the development of several post-hoc explainability methods that aim to extract information from learned policies thus aiding explainability. These methods rely on empirical observations of the policy and thus aim to generalize a characterization of agents' behaviour. In this study, we have instead developed a method to imbue a characteristic behaviour into agents' policies through regularization of their objective functions. Our method guides the agents' behaviour during learning which results in an intrinsic characterization; it connects the learning process with model explanation. We provide a formal argument and empirical evidence for the viability of our method. In future work, we intend to employ it to develop agents that optimize individual financial customers' investment portfolios based on their spending personalities.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2022.
Builds on
15 of 24 references.
References · 15
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 659
- 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 320
- 2019Explainable Reinforcement Learning Through a Causal Lenscited by 177
- 2020Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
- 2017Hybrid Reward Architecture for Reinforcement Learningcited by 57
- 2019Reinforcement Learning with Convex Constraintscited by 57
- 2019Information asymmetry in KL-regularized RLcited by 53
- 2019Control Regularization for Reduced Variance Reinforcement Learningcited by 34
- 2019Dot-to-Dot: Explainable Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulationcited by 33
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Can Interpretable Reinforcement Learning Manage Prosperity Your Way?cited by 6
- 2022Towards Artificial Virtuous Agents: Games, Dilemmas and Machine Learningcited by 3
- 2022Artificial virtuous agents in a multiagent tragedy of the commonscited by 3
- 2022Reinforcement Learning with Intrinsic Affinity for Personalized Prosperity Managementcited by 1
- 2022Symbolic Explanation of Affinity-Based Reinforcement Learning Agents with Markov Modelscited by 0
- 2026Fog of Love: Engineering Virtuous Agent Behavior with Affinity-based Reinforcement Learning in a Game Environmentcited by 0
- 2026Fog of Love: Engineering Virtuous Agent Behavior with Affinity-based Reinforcement Learning in a Game Environment3 Jun 2026
- 2022Artificial virtuous agents in a multiagent tragedy of the commons6 Oct 2022
- 2022Towards Artificial Virtuous Agents: Games, Dilemmas and Machine Learning30 Aug 2022
- 2022Symbolic Explanation of Affinity-Based Reinforcement Learning Agents with Markov Models26 Aug 2022
- 2022Reinforcement Learning with Intrinsic Affinity for Personalized Prosperity Management20 Apr 2022
- 2022Can Interpretable Reinforcement Learning Manage Prosperity Your Way?18 Feb 2022