WIDAR -- Weighted Input Document Augmented ROUGE
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The task of automatic text summarization has gained a lot of traction due to the recent advancements in machine learning techniques. However, evaluating the quality of a generated summary remains to be an open problem. The literature has widely adopted Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE) as the standard evaluation metric for summarization. However, ROUGE has some long-established limitations; a major one being its dependence on the availability of good quality reference summary. In this work, we propose the metric WIDAR which in addition to utilizing the reference summary uses also the input document in order to evaluate the quality of the generated summary. The proposed metric is versatile, since it is designed to adapt the evaluation score according to the quality of the reference summary. The proposed metric correlates better than ROUGE by 26%, 76%, 82%, and 15%, respectively, in coherence, consistency, fluency, and relevance on human judgement scores provided in the SummEval dataset. The proposed metric is able to obtain comparable results with other state-of-the-art metrics while requiring a relatively short computational time.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2022.
Builds on
22 of 48 references.
References · 22
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
- 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
- 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 809
- 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
- 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 415
- 2021XL-Sum: Large-Scale Multilingual Abstractive Summarization for 44 Languagescited by 346
- 2018Newsroom: A Dataset of 1.3 Million Summaries with Diverse Extractive Strategiescited by 292
- 2019Neural Text Summarization: A Critical Evaluationcited by 189
- 2020Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarizationcited by 144
- 2020MLSUM: The Multilingual Summarization Corpuscited by 121
- 2019Answers Unite! Unsupervised Metrics for Reinforced Summarization Modelscited by 92
10 more
- 2019Better Rewards Yield Better Summaries: Learning to Summarise Without Referencescited by 76
- 2020SUPERT: Towards New Frontiers in Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 69
- 2015Better Summarization Evaluation with Word Embeddings for ROUGEcited by 66
- 2018ROUGE 2.0: Updated and Improved Measures for Evaluation of Summarization Taskscited by 66
- 2019Question Answering as an Automatic Evaluation Metric for News Article Summarizationcited by 63
- 2021A Survey on Multi-modal Summarizationcited by 26
- 2017A Semantic QA-Based Approach for Text Summarization Evaluationcited by 17
- 2020Multi-Modal Summary Generation using Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 8
- 2020Is human scoring the best criteria for summary evaluation?cited by 7
- 2021Semantic Extractor-Paraphraser based Abstractive Summarizationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.
- 2022A Survey on Medical Document Summarizationcited by 14
- 2024PerSEval: Assessing Personalization in Text Summarizerscited by 3
- 2024PerSEval: Assessing Personalization in Text Summarizers29 Jun 2024
- 2022A Survey on Medical Document Summarization3 Dec 2022