mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Intra-domain and cross-domain transfer learning for time series data -- How transferable are the features?

arXiv 2201.04449 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2022cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In practice, it is very demanding and sometimes impossible to collect datasets of tagged data large enough to successfully train a machine learning model, and one possible solution to this problem is transfer learning. This study aims to assess how transferable are the features between different domains of time series data and under which conditions. The effects of transfer learning are observed in terms of predictive performance of the models and their convergence rate during training. In our experiment, we use reduced data sets of 1,500 and 9,000 data instances to mimic real world conditions. Using the same scaled-down datasets, we trained two sets of machine learning models: those that were trained with transfer learning and those that were trained from scratch. Four machine learning models were used for the experiment. Transfer of knowledge was performed within the same domain of application (seismology), as well as between mutually different domains of application (seismology, speech, medicine, finance). We observe the predictive performance of the models and the convergence rate during the training. In order to confirm the validity of the obtained results, we repeated the experiments seven times and applied statistical tests to confirm the significance of the results. The general conclusion of our study is that transfer learning is very likely to either increase or not negatively affect the predictive performance of the model or its convergence rate. The collected data is analysed in more details to determine which source and target domains are compatible for transfer of knowledge. We also analyse the effect of target dataset size and the selection of model and its hyperparameters on the effects of transfer learning.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2022.

Builds on

10 of 32 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
  2. 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,476
  3. 2018Speech Commands: A Dataset for Limited-Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 752
  4. 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 221
  5. 2018Multivariate LSTM-FCNs for Time Series Classificationcited by 120
  6. 2018Transfer learning for time series classificationcited by 60
  7. 2019Time Series Anomaly Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Transfer Learningcited by 40
  8. 2018Performance Metrics (Error Measures) in Machine Learning Regression, Forecasting and Prognostics: Properties and Typologycited by 35
  9. 2019ConvTimeNet: A Pre-trained Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Time Series Classificationcited by 20
  10. 2019A Machine-Learning Approach for Earthquake Magnitude Estimationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

6 papers.