A Research Agenda for AI Planning in the Field of Flexible Production Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Manufacturing companies face challenges when it comes to quickly adapting their production control to fluctuating demands or changing requirements. Control approaches that encapsulate production functions as services have shown to be promising in order to increase the flexibility of Cyber-Physical Production Systems. But an existing challenge of such approaches is finding a production plan based on provided functionalities for a demanded product, especially when there is no direct (i.e., syntactic) match between demanded and provided functions. While there is a variety of approaches to production planning, flexible production poses specific requirements that are not covered by existing research. In this contribution, we first capture these requirements for flexible production environments. Afterwards, an overview of current Artificial Intelligence approaches that can be utilized in order to overcome the aforementioned challenges is given. For this purpose, we focus on planning algorithms, but also consider models of production systems that can act as inputs to these algorithms. Approaches from both symbolic AI planning as well as approaches based on Machine Learning are discussed and eventually compared against the requirements. Based on this comparison, a research agenda is derived.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2021.
Builds on
9 of 54 references.
References · 9
- 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 796
- 2019Search on the Replay Buffer: Bridging Planning and Reinforcement Learningcited by 194
- 2019Learning Domain-Independent Planning Heuristics with Hypergraph Networkscited by 50
- 2019ASNets: Deep Learning for Generalised Planningcited by 42
- 2017Explainable Planningcited by 40
- 2018Graph2Seq: Graph to Sequence Learning with Attention-based Neural Networkscited by 37
- 2020Generalized Planning With Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
- 2021Ontology-Based Skill Description Learning for Flexible Production Systemscited by 2
- 2020Semantic CPPS in Industry 4.0cited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2025Evaluating Large Language Models for Real-World Engineering Taskscited by 7
- 2023Robustness and Generalization Performance of Deep Learning Models on Cyber-Physical Systems: A Comparative Studycited by 2
- 2025Integrating AI Planning Semantics into SysML System Models for Automated PDDL File Generationcited by 2
- 2023Automated Process Planning Based on a Semantic Capability Model and SMTcited by 1
- 2025Bridging Engineering and AI Planning through Model-Based Knowledge Transformation for the Validation of Automated Production System Variantscited by 1
- 2022On a Uniform Causality Model for Industrial Automationcited by 0
- 2026Avionic Main Fuel Pump Simulation and Fault-Diagnosis Benchmarkcited by 0
- 2026From Capability Models to Automated Planning: An AAS-Native Approach for Automatic PDDL Generationcited by 0
- 2026From Capability Models to Automated Planning: An AAS-Native Approach for Automatic PDDL Generation1 Jun 2026
- 2026Avionic Main Fuel Pump Simulation and Fault-Diagnosis Benchmark23 Apr 2026
- 2025Bridging Engineering and AI Planning through Model-Based Knowledge Transformation for the Validation of Automated Production System Variants15 Sep 2025
- 2025Integrating AI Planning Semantics into SysML System Models for Automated PDDL File Generation7 Jun 2025
- 2025Evaluating Large Language Models for Real-World Engineering Tasks12 May 2025
- 2023Automated Process Planning Based on a Semantic Capability Model and SMT14 Dec 2023
- 2023Robustness and Generalization Performance of Deep Learning Models on Cyber-Physical Systems: A Comparative Study13 Jun 2023
- 2022On a Uniform Causality Model for Industrial Automation20 Sep 2022