AET-SGD: Asynchronous Event-triggered Stochastic Gradient Descent
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Communication cost is the main bottleneck for the design of effective distributed learning algorithms. Recently, event-triggered techniques have been proposed to reduce the exchanged information among compute nodes and thus alleviate the communication cost. However, most existing event-triggered approaches only consider heuristic event-triggered thresholds. They also ignore the impact of computation and network delay, which play an important role on the training performance. In this paper, we propose an Asynchronous Event-triggered Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) framework, called AET-SGD, to i) reduce the communication cost among the compute nodes, and ii) mitigate the impact of the delay. Compared with baseline event-triggered methods, AET-SGD employs a linear increasing sample size event-triggered threshold, and can significantly reduce the communication cost while keeping good convergence performance. We implement AET-SGD and evaluate its performance on multiple representative data sets, including MNIST, FashionMNIST, KMNIST and CIFAR10. The experimental results validate the correctness of the design and show a significant communication cost reduction from 44x to 120x, compared to the state of the art. Our results also show that AET-SGD can resist large delay from the straggler nodes while obtaining a decent performance and a desired speedup ratio.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2021.
Builds on
24 of 40 references.
References · 24
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 832
- 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 605
- 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 564
- 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 422
- 2019Asynchronous Federated Optimizationcited by 267
- 2018Don't Use Large Mini-Batches, Use Local SGDcited by 202
- 2017Revisiting Distributed Synchronous SGDcited by 142
- 2015Asynchronous Parallel Stochastic Gradient for Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 116
- 2019Local SGD with Periodic Averaging: Tighter Analysis and Adaptive Synchronizationcited by 107
12 more
- 2019Communication-Efficient Federated Deep Learning with Asynchronous Model Update and Temporally Weighted Aggregationcited by 100
- 2016Asynchronous Stochastic Gradient Descent with Delay Compensationcited by 99
- 2018SGD and Hogwild! Convergence Without the Bounded Gradients Assumptioncited by 95
- 2015Perturbed Iterate Analysis for Asynchronous Stochastic Optimizationcited by 67
- 2019A Distributed Synchronous SGD Algorithm with Global Top-k Sparsification for Low Bandwidth Networkscited by 37
- 2015Taming the Wild: A Unified Analysis of Hogwild!-Style Algorithmscited by 31
- 2018Improved asynchronous parallel optimization analysis for stochastic incremental methodscited by 30
- 2018New Convergence Aspects of Stochastic Gradient Algorithmscited by 30
- 2020Learning Structured Communication for Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2019Distributed Deep Learning with Event-Triggered Communicationcited by 5
- 2020Hogwild! over Distributed Local Data Sets with Linearly Increasing Mini-Batch Sizescited by 5
- 2016Asynchronous Stochastic Proximal Optimization Algorithms with Variance Reductioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.