mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inverse deep learning methods and benchmarks for artificial electromagnetic material design

arXiv 2112.10254 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2021cs.LG cond-mat.mtrl-scicited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning (DL) inverse techniques have increased the speed of artificial electromagnetic material (AEM) design and improved the quality of resulting devices. Many DL inverse techniques have succeeded on a number of AEM design tasks, but to compare, contrast, and evaluate assorted techniques it is critical to clarify the underlying ill-posedness of inverse problems. Here we review state-of-the-art approaches and present a comprehensive survey of deep learning inverse methods and invertible and conditional invertible neural networks to AEM design. We produce easily accessible and rapidly implementable AEM design benchmarks, which offers a methodology to efficiently determine the DL technique best suited to solving different design challenges. Our methodology is guided by constraints on repeated simulation and an easily integrated metric, which we propose expresses the relative ill-posedness of any AEM design problem. We show that as the problem becomes increasingly ill-posed, the neural adjoint with boundary loss (NA) generates better solutions faster, regardless of simulation constraints. On simpler AEM design tasks, direct neural networks (NN) fare better when simulations are limited, while geometries predicted by mixture density networks (MDN) and conditional variational auto-encoders (VAE) can improve with continued sampling and re-simulation.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2021.

Builds on

13 of 66 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
  4. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  5. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  6. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,058
  7. 2018Analyzing Inverse Problems with Invertible Neural Networkscited by 242
  8. 2020Deep neural networks for the evaluation and design of photonic devicescited by 50
  9. 2020Benchmarking deep inverse models over time, and the neural-adjoint methodcited by 28
  10. 2018A Generative Model for Inverse Design of Metamaterialscited by 27
  11. 2021Benchmarking Invertible Architectures on Inverse Problemscited by 25
  12. 2019Designing nanophotonic structures using conditional-deep convolutional generative adversarial networkscited by 16
1 more
  1. 2019Deep learning approach based on dimensionality reduction for designing electromagnetic nanostructurescited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

10 papers.