mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

IDToolkit: A Toolkit for Benchmarking and Developing Inverse Design Algorithms in Nanophotonics

arXiv 2305.18978 ↗First posted 30 May 2023cs.AI cs.LG physics.opticscited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Aiding humans with scientific designs is one of the most exciting of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), due to their potential for the discovery of new drugs, design of new materials and chemical compounds, etc. However, scientific design typically requires complex domain knowledge that is not familiar to AI researchers. Further, scientific studies involve professional skills to perform experiments and evaluations. These obstacles prevent AI researchers from developing specialized methods for scientific designs. To take a step towards easy-to-understand and reproducible research of scientific design, we propose a benchmark for the inverse design of nanophotonic devices, which can be verified computationally and accurately. Specifically, we implemented three different nanophotonic design problems, namely a radiative cooler, a selective emitter for thermophotovoltaics, and structural color filters, all of which are different in design parameter spaces, complexity, and design targets. The benchmark environments are implemented with an open-source simulator. We further implemented 10 different inverse design algorithms and compared them in a reproducible and fair framework. The results revealed the strengths and weaknesses of existing methods, which shed light on several future directions for developing more efficient inverse design algorithms. Our benchmark can also serve as the starting point for more challenging scientific design problems. The code of IDToolkit is available at https://github.com/ThyrixYang/IDToolkit.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2023.

Builds on

23 of 71 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  5. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,162
  6. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
  7. 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,013
  8. 2016Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of moleculescited by 765
  9. 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
  10. 2017StarCraft II: A New Challenge for Reinforcement Learningcited by 274
  11. 2018Analyzing Inverse Problems with Invertible Neural Networkscited by 242
  12. 2021A Survey of Human-in-the-loop for Machine Learningcited by 215
11 more
  1. 2021Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmarkcited by 208
  2. 2022Sample Efficiency Matters: A Benchmark for Practical Molecular Optimizationcited by 155
  3. 2021Machine Learning in the Search for New Fundamental Physicscited by 50
  4. 2019Generative adversarial networks (GAN) based efficient sampling of chemical space for inverse design of inorganic materialscited by 46
  5. 2020Benchmarking deep inverse models over time, and the neural-adjoint methodcited by 28
  6. 2021Benchmarking Invertible Architectures on Inverse Problemscited by 25
  7. 2014BayesOpt: A Bayesian Optimization Library for Nonlinear Optimization, Experimental Design and Banditscited by 18
  8. 2022MGCVAE: Multi-objective Inverse Design via Molecular Graph Conditional Variational Autoencodercited by 16
  9. 2021Inverse deep learning methods and benchmarks for artificial electromagnetic material designcited by 10
  10. 2022DeepAdjoint: An All-in-One Photonic Inverse Design Framework Integrating Data-Driven Machine Learning with Optimization Algorithmscited by 5
  11. 2021RID-Noise: Towards Robust Inverse Design under Noisy Environmentscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.