mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Batch Label Inference and Replacement Attacks in Black-Boxed Vertical Federated Learning

arXiv 2112.05409 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2021cs.LGcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In a vertical federated learning (VFL) scenario where features and model are split into different parties, communications of sample-specific updates are required for correct gradient calculations but can be used to deduce important sample-level label information. An immediate defense strategy is to protect sample-level messages communicated with Homomorphic Encryption (HE), and in this way only the batch-averaged local gradients are exposed to each party (termed black-boxed VFL). In this paper, we first explore the possibility of recovering labels in the vertical federated learning setting with HE-protected communication, and show that private labels can be reconstructed with high accuracy by training a gradient inversion model. Furthermore, we show that label replacement backdoor attacks can be conducted in black-boxed VFL by directly replacing encrypted communicated messages (termed gradient-replacement attack). As it is a common presumption that batch-averaged information is safe to share, batch label inference and replacement attacks are a severe challenge to VFL. To defend against batch label inference attack, we further evaluate several defense strategies, including confusional autoencoder (CoAE), a technique we proposed based on autoencoder and entropy regularization. We demonstrate that label inference and replacement attacks can be successfully blocked by this technique without hurting as much main task accuracy as compared to existing methods.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2021.

Builds on

17 of 27 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  2. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
  3. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  4. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
  5. 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 478
  6. 2019Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applicationscited by 412
  7. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
  8. 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
  9. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
  10. 2019Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?cited by 255
  11. 2019SecureBoost: A Lossless Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 176
  12. 2017A Survey on Homomorphic Encryption Schemes: Theory and Implementationcited by 156
5 more
  1. 2021Label Leakage and Protection in Two-party Split Learningcited by 90
  2. 2020Privacy-preserving Collaborative Learning with Automatic Transformation Searchcited by 31
  3. 2020Backdoor attacks and defenses in feature-partitioned collaborative learningcited by 30
  4. 2019Learning Privately over Distributed Features: An ADMM Sharing Approachcited by 14
  5. 2018Secure Federated Transfer Learningcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 3.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022A Survey on Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 42
  2. 2023Backdoor Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: Survey, Challenges and Future Research Directionscited by 33
  3. 2023A Survey on Vertical Federated Learning: From a Layered Perspectivecited by 30
  4. 2024Vertical Federated Learning for Effectiveness, Security, Applicability: A Surveycited by 14
  5. 2022Feature Reconstruction Attacks and Countermeasures of DNN training in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 13
  6. 2022HashVFL: Defending Against Data Reconstruction Attacks in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 10
  7. 2024A Survey of Privacy Threats and Defense in Vertical Federated Learning: From Model Life Cycle Perspectivecited by 7
  8. 2022Hijack Vertical Federated Learning Models As One Partycited by 5
  9. 2025Vertical Federated Learning in Practice: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 4
  10. 2024Training on Fake Labels: Mitigating Label Leakage in Split Learning via Secure Dimension Transformationcited by 2
  11. 2024A GAN-based data poisoning framework against anomaly detection in vertical federated learningcited by 1
  12. 2024Venomancer: Towards Imperceptible and Target-on-Demand Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 1
4 more
  1. 2024Just a Simple Transformation is Enough for Data Protection in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 1
  2. 2025BadFU: Backdoor Federated Learning through Adversarial Machine Unlearningcited by 1
  3. 2023SecureBoost Hyperparameter Tuning via Multi-Objective Federated Learningcited by 0
  4. 2025ICAFS: Inter-Client-Aware Feature Selection for Vertical Federated Learningcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024KDk: A Defense Mechanism Against Label Inference Attacks in Vertical Federated Learning
  2. 2025Cooperative Decentralized Backdoor Attacks on Vertical Federated Learning
  3. 2023Mutual Information Regularization for Vertical Federated Learning
  4. 2025HASSLE: A Self-Supervised Learning Enhanced Hijacking Attack on Vertical Federated Learning
  5. 2024Towards Privacy-Guaranteed Label Unlearning in Vertical Federated Learning: Few-Shot Forgetting without Disclosure
  6. 2024VFLIP: A Backdoor Defense for Vertical Federated Learning via Identification and Purification
  7. 2024GDBR: Label Recovery Attack Against Partial Gradient Encryption in Federated Learning
  8. 2026Is the Trigger Essential? A Feature-Based Triggerless Backdoor Attack in Vertical Federated Learning