GDBR: Label Recovery Attack Against Partial Gradient Encryption in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The increasing demand for data privacy, alongside the benefits of aggregating data from networked devices, has catalyzed the emergence of federated learning (FL). In FL, clients jointly train a global model by sharing gradients computed over private data. While this paradigm eliminates the need to exchange raw data, inference attacks can still be launched to extract sensitive information from gradients. To this end, partial gradient encryption has emerged as a promising design for balancing privacy and efficiency in practical FL systems, as encrypting only the classification-head gradients is believed to prevent known inference attacks while avoiding the high computational cost of encrypting the entire model. However, this design provides a false sense of privacy. By proposing GDBR, we show that sharing even a single unencrypted layer of gradients can lead to serious privacy leakage. GDBR is the first attack capable of high-fidelity label recovery with partial access to the gradients. It exploits a vulnerability in a commonly used neural building block, constructs a gradient bridge from the unencrypted layer to the final output layer, and approximates the logits information for accurate inference of private labels. These inferred labels not only reveal sensitive information about a client's private dataset but also serve as a prerequisite for many downstream attacks, such as data reconstruction and membership inference. GDBR brings these threats squarely into scope for FL systems employing partial encryption. In addition to theoretical analysis, extensive experiments demonstrate the severity of the problem across a wide variety of datasets and model architectures, including convolutional and transformer-based networks. Overall, our findings challenge the widespread assumption that encrypting only the output layer suffices for privacy protection.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2024.
Builds on
22 of 37 references.
References · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
- 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 367
- 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 320
10 more
- 2020R-GAP: Recursive Gradient Attack on Privacycited by 95
- 2022Recovering Private Text in Federated Learning of Language Modelscited by 67
- 2020A Framework for Evaluating Gradient Leakage Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 63
- 2022LAMP: Extracting Text from Gradients with Language Model Priorscited by 52
- 2021Towards General Deep Leakage in Federated Learningcited by 40
- 2022A Survey on Gradient Inversion: Attacks, Defenses and Future Directionscited by 39
- 2023FedML-HE: An Efficient Homomorphic-Encryption-Based Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Systemcited by 38
- 2021User-Level Label Leakage from Gradients in Federated Learningcited by 21
- 2021Revealing and Protecting Labels in Distributed Trainingcited by 17
- 2021A Method to Reveal Speaker Identity in Distributed ASR Training, and How to Counter Itcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.