mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Feature matching for multi-epoch historical aerial images

arXiv 2112.04255 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2021cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Historical imagery is characterized by high spatial resolution and stereo-scopic acquisitions, providing a valuable resource for recovering 3D land-cover information. Accurate geo-referencing of diachronic historical images by means of self-calibration remains a bottleneck because of the difficulty to find sufficient amount of feature correspondences under evolving landscapes. In this research, we present a fully automatic approach to detecting feature correspondences between historical images taken at different times (i.e., inter-epoch), without auxiliary data required. Based on relative orientations computed within the same epoch (i.e., intra-epoch), we obtain DSMs (Digital Surface Model) and incorporate them in a rough-to-precise matching. The method consists of: (1) an inter-epoch DSMs matching to roughly co-register the orientations and DSMs (i.e, the 3D Helmert transformation), followed by (2) a precise inter-epoch feature matching using the original RGB images. The innate ambiguity of the latter is largely alleviated by narrowing down the search space using the co-registered data. With the inter-epoch features, we refine the image orientations and quantitatively evaluate the results (1) with DoD (Difference of DSMs), (2) with ground check points, and (3) by quantifying ground displacement due to an earthquake. We demonstrate that our method: (1) can automatically georeference diachronic historical images; (2) can effectively mitigate systematic errors induced by poorly estimated camera parameters; (3) is robust to drastic scene changes. Compared to the state-of-the-art, our method improves the image georeferencing accuracy by a factor of 2. The proposed methods are implemented in MicMac, a free, open-source photogrammetric software.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2021.

Builds on

16 of 64 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,437
  2. 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,313
  3. 2016LIFT: Learned Invariant Feature Transformcited by 305
  4. 2016DSAC - Differentiable RANSAC for Camera Localizationcited by 264
  5. 2016Large-Scale Image Retrieval with Attentive Deep Local Featurescited by 238
  6. 2020Image Matching across Wide Baselines: From Paper to Practicecited by 224
  7. 2017Working hard to know your neighbor's margins: Local descriptor learning losscited by 212
  8. 2017Learning to Find Good Correspondencescited by 176
  9. 2018LF-Net: Learning Local Features from Imagescited by 151
  10. 2017Graph-Cut RANSACcited by 133
  11. 2020ASLFeat: Learning Local Features of Accurate Shape and Localizationcited by 129
  12. 2018MAGSAC: marginalizing sample consensuscited by 122
4 more
  1. 2019ContextDesc: Local Descriptor Augmentation with Cross-Modality Contextcited by 79
  2. 2014Domain-Size Pooling in Local Descriptors: DSP-SIFTcited by 14
  3. 2020Co-Attention for Conditioned Image Matchingcited by 9
  4. 2018The Time-SIFT method : detecting 3-D changes from archival photogrammetric analysis with almost exclusively image informationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2.

3 papers.