mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Application of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Payment Fraud

arXiv 2112.04236 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The large variety of digital payment choices available to consumers today has been a key driver of e-commerce transactions in the past decade. Unfortunately, this has also given rise to cybercriminals and fraudsters who are constantly looking for vulnerabilities in these systems by deploying increasingly sophisticated fraud attacks. A typical fraud detection system employs standard supervised learning methods where the focus is on maximizing the fraud recall rate. However, we argue that such a formulation can lead to sub-optimal solutions. The design requirements for these fraud models requires that they are robust to the high-class imbalance in the data, adaptive to changes in fraud patterns, maintain a balance between the fraud rate and the decline rate to maximize revenue, and be amenable to asynchronous feedback since usually there is a significant lag between the transaction and the fraud realization. To achieve this, we formulate fraud detection as a sequential decision-making problem by including the utility maximization within the model in the form of the reward function. The historical decline rate and fraud rate define the state of the system with a binary action space composed of approving or declining the transaction. In this study, we primarily focus on utility maximization and explore different reward functions to this end. The performance of the proposed Reinforcement Learning system has been evaluated for two publicly available fraud datasets using Deep Q-learning and compared with different classifiers. We aim to address the rest of the issues in future work.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2021.

Builds on

17 of 50 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
  3. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  4. 2017Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discoverycited by 566
  5. 2020Curriculum Learning for Reinforcement Learning Domains: A Framework and Surveycited by 350
  6. 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 290
  7. 2020Decoupling Representation Learning from Reinforcement Learningcited by 263
  8. 2019Deep Anomaly Detection with Deviation Networkscited by 152
  9. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cyber Securitycited by 92
  10. 2020COG: Connecting New Skills to Past Experience with Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
  11. 2021Return-Based Contrastive Representation Learning for Reinforcement Learningcited by 36
  12. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning for Imbalanced Classificationcited by 24
5 more
  1. 2020Sequential Anomaly Detection using Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
  2. 2020Deep Q-Network-based Adaptive Alert Threshold Selection Policy for Payment Fraud Systems in Retail Bankingcited by 10
  3. 2019Towards automated feature engineering for credit card fraud detection using multi-perspective HMMscited by 7
  4. 2020Deep Learning Methods for Credit Card Fraud Detectioncited by 6
  5. 2019A Time Attention based Fraud Transaction Detection Frameworkcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

3 papers.