mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparse, Efficient and Explainable Data Attribution with DualXDA

arXiv 2402.12118 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data Attribution (DA) is an emerging approach in the field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), aiming to identify influential training datapoints which determine model outputs. It seeks to provide transparency about the model and individual predictions, e.g. for model debugging, identifying data-related causes of suboptimal performance. However, existing DA approaches suffer from prohibitively high computational costs and memory demands when applied to even medium-scale datasets and models, forcing practitioners to resort to approximations that may fail to capture the true inference process of the underlying model. Additionally, current attribution methods exhibit low sparsity, resulting in non-negligible attribution scores across a high number of training examples, hindering the discovery of decisive patterns in the data. In this work, we introduce DualXDA, a framework for sparse, efficient and explainable DA, comprised of two interlinked approaches, Dual Data Attribution (DualDA) and eXplainable Data Attribution (XDA): With DualDA, we propose a novel approach for efficient and effective DA, leveraging Support Vector Machine theory to provide fast and naturally sparse data attributions for AI predictions. In extensive quantitative analyses, we demonstrate that DualDA achieves high attribution quality, excels at solving a series of evaluated downstream tasks, while at the same time improving explanation time by a factor of up to 4,100,000x compared to the original Influence Functions method, and up to 11,000x compared to the method's most efficient approximation from literature to date. We further introduce XDA, a method for enhancing Data Attribution with capabilities from feature attribution methods to explain why training samples are relevant for the prediction of a test sample in terms of impactful features, which we showcase and verify qualitatively in detail.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2024.

Builds on

39 of 71 references.

References · 39

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  5. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  6. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  7. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  8. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
  9. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
  10. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 536
  11. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
  12. 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
27 more
  1. 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 308
  2. 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 273
  3. 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
  4. 2018Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networkscited by 187
  5. 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 185
  6. 2018Gradient descent aligns the layers of deep linear networkscited by 182
  7. 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
  8. 2022DeepCore: A Comprehensive Library for Coreset Selection in Deep Learningcited by 146
  9. 2022If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?cited by 142
  10. 2022From Attribution Maps to Human-Understandable Explanations through Concept Relevance Propagationcited by 141
  11. 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 130
  12. 2019Transferable Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Deep Neural Netscited by 129
  13. 2019Implicit Regularization of Discrete Gradient Dynamics in Linear Neural Networkscited by 122
  14. 2020FastIF: Scalable Influence Functions for Efficient Model Interpretation and Debuggingcited by 120
  15. 2024AttnLRP: Attention-Aware Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation for Transformerscited by 116
  16. 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
  17. 2021Influence Selection for Active Learningcited by 82
  18. 2021Input Similarity from the Neural Network Perspectivecited by 78
  19. 2020Influence Function based Data Poisoning Attacks to Top-N Recommender Systemscited by 61
  20. 2021Software for Dataset-wide XAI: From Local Explanations to Global Insights with Zennit, CoRelAy, and ViRelAycited by 53
  21. 2022Measuring the Effect of Training Data on Deep Learning Predictions via Randomized Experimentscited by 50
  22. 2019Evaluating Explanation Methods for Deep Learning in Securitycited by 38
  23. 2021An Empirical Comparison of Instance Attribution Methods for NLPcited by 35
  24. 2020Building and Interpreting Deep Similarity Modelscited by 34
  25. 2022Identifying a Training-Set Attack's Target Using Renormalized Influence Estimationcited by 32
  26. 2022Contrastive Error Attribution for Finetuned Language Modelscited by 12
  27. 2021Training Deep Models to be Explained with Fewer Examplescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

6 papers.