mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Catch Me If You Can: Blackbox Adversarial Attacks on Automatic Speech Recognition using Frequency Masking

arXiv 2112.01821 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2021cs.SD cs.CL cs.SEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) models are prevalent, particularly in applications for voice navigation and voice control of domestic appliances. The computational core of ASRs are deep neural networks (DNNs) that have been shown to be susceptible to adversarial perturbations; easily misused by attackers to generate malicious outputs. To help test the security and robustnesss of ASRS, we propose techniques that generate blackbox (agnostic to the DNN), untargeted adversarial attacks that are portable across ASRs. This is in contrast to existing work that focuses on whitebox targeted attacks that are time consuming and lack portability. Our techniques generate adversarial attacks that have no human audible difference by manipulating the audio signal using a psychoacoustic model that maintains the audio perturbations below the thresholds of human perception. We evaluate portability and effectiveness of our techniques using three popular ASRs and two input audio datasets using the metrics - Word Error Rate (WER) of output transcription, Similarity to original audio, attack Success Rate on different ASRs and Detection score by a defense system. We found our adversarial attacks were portable across ASRs, not easily detected by a state-of-the-art defense system, and had significant difference in output transcriptions while sounding similar to original audio.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2021.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  4. 2019Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpuscited by 1,384
  5. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
  6. 2014Deep Speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognitioncited by 354
  7. 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 274
  8. 2019Imperceptible, Robust, and Targeted Adversarial Examples for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 124
  9. 2018Adversarial Attacks Against Automatic Speech Recognition Systems via Psychoacoustic Hidingcited by 85
  10. 2018CommanderSong: A Systematic Approach for Practical Adversarial Voice Recognitioncited by 66
  11. 2018Did you hear that? Adversarial Examples Against Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 48
  12. 2020SoK: The Faults in our ASRs: An Overview of Attacks against Automatic Speech Recognition and Speaker Identification Systemscited by 46
10 more
  1. 2018Robust Audio Adversarial Example for a Physical Attackcited by 44
  2. 2018Targeted Adversarial Examples for Black Box Audio Systemscited by 41
  3. 2019Universal Adversarial Perturbations for Speech Recognition Systemscited by 41
  4. 2021WaveGuard: Understanding and Mitigating Audio Adversarial Examplescited by 40
  5. 2019Hear "No Evil", See "Kenansville": Efficient and Transferable Black-Box Attacks on Speech Recognition and Voice Identification Systemscited by 38
  6. 2018Characterizing Audio Adversarial Examples Using Temporal Dependencycited by 36
  7. 2019Imperio: Robust Over-the-Air Adversarial Examples for Automatic Speech Recognition Systemscited by 16
  8. 2019Perceptual Based Adversarial Audio Attackscited by 13
  9. 2020Inaudible Adversarial Perturbations for Targeted Attack in Speaker Recognitioncited by 13
  10. 2021Beyond Lp clipping: Equalization-based Psychoacoustic Attacks against ASRscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.