mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detecting Adversaries, yet Faltering to Noise? Leveraging Conditional Variational AutoEncoders for Adversary Detection in the Presence of Noisy Images

arXiv 2111.15518 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2021cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid advancement and increased use of deep learning models in image identification, security becomes a major concern to their deployment in safety-critical systems. Since the accuracy and robustness of deep learning models are primarily attributed from the purity of the training samples, therefore the deep learning architectures are often susceptible to adversarial attacks. Adversarial attacks are often obtained by making subtle perturbations to normal images, which are mostly imperceptible to humans, but can seriously confuse the state-of-the-art machine learning models. What is so special in the slightest intelligent perturbations or noise additions over normal images that it leads to catastrophic classifications by the deep neural networks? Using statistical hypothesis testing, we find that Conditional Variational AutoEncoders (CVAE) are surprisingly good at detecting imperceptible image perturbations. In this paper, we show how CVAEs can be effectively used to detect adversarial attacks on image classification networks. We demonstrate our results over MNIST, CIFAR-10 dataset and show how our method gives comparable performance to the state-of-the-art methods in detecting adversaries while not getting confused with noisy images, where most of the existing methods falter.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2021.

Builds on

21 of 31 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  5. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  6. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  7. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
  8. 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
  9. 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
  10. 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 244
  11. 2017PixelDefend: Leveraging Generative Models to Understand and Defend against Adversarial Examplescited by 243
  12. 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
9 more
  1. 2020DeepRobust: A PyTorch Library for Adversarial Attacks and Defensescited by 78
  2. 2016Adversarial Examples Detection in Deep Networks with Convolutional Filter Statisticscited by 77
  3. 2017Adversarial and Clean Data Are Not Twinscited by 52
  4. 2021Detecting Adversarial Examples Is (Nearly) As Hard As Classifying Themcited by 46
  5. 2020Maximum Mean Discrepancy Test is Aware of Adversarial Attackscited by 44
  6. 2019When Explainability Meets Adversarial Learning: Detecting Adversarial Examples using SHAP Signaturescited by 40
  7. 2016Early Methods for Detecting Adversarial Imagescited by 36
  8. 2019PuVAE: A Variational Autoencoder to Purify Adversarial Examplescited by 28
  9. 2017Blocking Transferability of Adversarial Examples in Black-Box Learning Systemscited by 19

Built on by

Not cited yet.