mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Linguistic Knowledge in Data Augmentation for Natural Language Processing: An Example on Chinese Question Matching

arXiv 2111.14709 ↗First posted 29 Nov 2021cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To investigate the role of linguistic knowledge in data augmentation (DA) for Natural Language Processing (NLP), we designed two adapted DA programs and applied them to LCQMC (a Large-scale Chinese Question Matching Corpus) for a binary Chinese question matching classification task. The two DA programs produce augmented texts by five simple text editing operations (or DA techniques), largely irrespective of language generation rules, but one is enhanced with a pre-trained n-gram language model to fuse it with prior linguistic knowledge. We then trained four neural network models (BOW, CNN, LSTM, and GRU) and a pre-trained model (ERNIE-Gram) on the LCQMCs train sets of varying size as well as the related augmented train sets produced by the two DA programs. The results show that there are no significant performance differences between the models trained on the two types of augmented train sets, both when the five DA techniques are applied together or separately. Moreover, due to the inability of the five DA techniques to make strictly paraphrastic augmented texts, the results indicate the need of sufficient amounts of training examples for the classification models trained on them to mediate the negative impact of false matching augmented text pairs and improve performance, a limitation of random text editing perturbations used as a DA approach. Similar results were also obtained for English.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2021.

Builds on

16 of 33 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  2. 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,355
  3. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  4. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  5. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
  6. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  7. 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 408
  8. 2015Improved Semantic Representations From Tree-Structured Long Short-Term Memory Networkscited by 305
  9. 2018Contextual Augmentation: Data Augmentation by Words with Paradigmatic Relationscited by 201
  10. 2020An Empirical Survey of Data Augmentation for Time Series Classification with Neural Networkscited by 128
  11. 2020Logic-Guided Data Augmentation and Regularization for Consistent Question Answeringcited by 77
  12. 2018Sequence-to-Sequence Data Augmentation for Dialogue Language Understandingcited by 67
4 more
  1. 2019XLDA: Cross-Lingual Data Augmentation for Natural Language Inference and Question Answeringcited by 35
  2. 2020ERNIE-Gram: Pre-Training with Explicitly N-Gram Masked Language Modeling for Natural Language Understandingcited by 17
  3. 2018AdvEntuRe: Adversarial Training for Textual Entailment with Knowledge-Guided Examplescited by 14
  4. 2018Sentence Modeling via Multiple Word Embeddings and Multi-level Comparison for Semantic Textual Similaritycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.