mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A model of semantic completion in generative episodic memory

arXiv 2111.13537 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2021q-bio.NC cs.CV cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many different studies have suggested that episodic memory is a generative process, but most computational models adopt a storage view. In this work, we propose a computational model for generative episodic memory. It is based on the central hypothesis that the hippocampus stores and retrieves selected aspects of an episode as a memory trace, which is necessarily incomplete. At recall, the neocortex reasonably fills in the missing information based on general semantic information in a process we call semantic completion. As episodes we use images of digits (MNIST) augmented by different backgrounds representing context. Our model is based on a VQ-VAE which generates a compressed latent representation in form of an index matrix, which still has some spatial resolution. We assume that attention selects some part of the index matrix while others are discarded, this then represents the gist of the episode and is stored as a memory trace. At recall the missing parts are filled in by a PixelCNN, modeling semantic completion, and the completed index matrix is then decoded into a full image by the VQ-VAE. The model is able to complete missing parts of a memory trace in a semantically plausible way up to the point where it can generate plausible images from scratch. Due to the combinatorics in the index matrix, the model generalizes well to images not trained on. Compression as well as semantic completion contribute to a strong reduction in memory requirements and robustness to noise. Finally we also model an episodic memory experiment and can reproduce that semantically congruent contexts are always recalled better than incongruent ones, high attention levels improve memory accuracy in both cases, and contexts that are not remembered correctly are more often remembered semantically congruently than completely wrong.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2021.

Builds on

13 of 80 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  3. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  4. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
  5. 2019Generating Diverse High-Fidelity Images with VQ-VAE-2cited by 1,387
  6. 2016Conditional Image Generation with PixelCNN Decoderscited by 862
  7. 2018Image Transformercited by 772
  8. 2015Deep multi-scale video prediction beyond mean square errorcited by 300
  9. 2020Convolutional Neural Networks as a Model of the Visual System: Past, Present, and Futurecited by 83
  10. 2021Predicting Video with VQVAEcited by 61
  11. 2017Recurrent computations for visual pattern completioncited by 22
  12. 2019Stacked autoencoders based machine learning for noise reduction and signal reconstruction in geophysical datacited by 2
1 more
  1. 2019A Hippocampus Model for Online One-Shot Storage of Pattern Sequencescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.