mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Representing Prior Knowledge Using Randomly, Weighted Feature Networks for Visual Relationship Detection

arXiv 2111.10686 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The single-hidden-layer Randomly Weighted Feature Network (RWFN) introduced by Hong and Pavlic (2021) was developed as an alternative to neural tensor network approaches for relational learning tasks. Its relatively small footprint combined with the use of two randomized input projections -- an insect-brain-inspired input representation and random Fourier features -- allow it to achieve rich expressiveness for relational learning with relatively low training cost. In particular, when Hong and Pavlic compared RWFN to Logic Tensor Networks (LTNs) for Semantic Image Interpretation (SII) tasks to extract structured semantic descriptions from images, they showed that the RWFN integration of the two hidden, randomized representations better captures relationships among inputs with a faster training process even though it uses far fewer learnable parameters. In this paper, we use RWFNs to perform Visual Relationship Detection (VRD) tasks, which are more challenging SII tasks. A zero-shot learning approach is used with RWFN that can exploit similarities with other seen relationships and background knowledge -- expressed with logical constraints between subjects, relations, and objects -- to achieve the ability to predict triples that do not appear in the training set. The experiments on the Visual Relationship Dataset to compare the performance between RWFNs and LTNs, one of the leading Statistical Relational Learning frameworks, show that RWFNs outperform LTNs for the predicate-detection task while using fewer number of adaptable parameters (1:56 ratio). Furthermore, background knowledge represented by RWFNs can be used to alleviate the incompleteness of training sets even though the space complexity of RWFNs is much smaller than LTNs (1:27 ratio).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2021.

Builds on

17 of 50 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  2. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  3. 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
  4. 2017Scene Graph Generation by Iterative Message Passingcited by 462
  5. 2017Neural Motifs: Scene Graph Parsing with Global Contextcited by 413
  6. 2016Visual Relationship Detection with Language Priorscited by 333
  7. 2014Detect What You Can: Detecting and Representing Objects using Holistic Models and Body Partscited by 230
  8. 2020Logic Tensor Networkscited by 197
  9. 2017Detecting Visual Relationships with Deep Relational Networkscited by 97
  10. 2017Logic Tensor Networks for Semantic Image Interpretationcited by 92
  11. 2015On the Error of Random Fourier Featurescited by 76
  12. 2017Visual Relationship Detection with Internal and External Linguistic Knowledge Distillationcited by 60
5 more
  1. 2018Unsupervised Learning by Competing Hidden Unitscited by 44
  2. 2018Zoom-Net: Mining Deep Feature Interactions for Visual Relationship Recognitioncited by 41
  3. 2017Deep Variation-structured Reinforcement Learning for Visual Relationship and Attribute Detectioncited by 28
  4. 2019Compensating Supervision Incompleteness with Prior Knowledge in Semantic Image Interpretationcited by 11
  5. 2021An Insect-Inspired Randomly, Weighted Neural Network with Random Fourier Features For Neuro-Symbolic Relational Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2.

3 papers.