mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Concept-Centric Transformers: Enhancing Model Interpretability through Object-Centric Concept Learning within a Shared Global Workspace

arXiv 2305.15775 ↗First posted 25 May 2023cs.LG cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many interpretable AI approaches have been proposed to provide plausible explanations for a model's decision-making. However, configuring an explainable model that effectively communicates among computational modules has received less attention. A recently proposed shared global workspace theory showed that networks of distributed modules can benefit from sharing information with a bottlenecked memory because the communication constraints encourage specialization, compositionality, and synchronization among the modules. Inspired by this, we propose Concept-Centric Transformers, a simple yet effective configuration of the shared global workspace for interpretability, consisting of: i) an object-centric-based memory module for extracting semantic concepts from input features, ii) a cross-attention mechanism between the learned concept and input embeddings, and iii) standard classification and explanation losses to allow human analysts to directly assess an explanation for the model's classification reasoning. We test our approach against other existing concept-based methods on classification tasks for various datasets, including CIFAR100, CUB-200-2011, and ImageNet, and we show that our model achieves better classification accuracy than all baselines across all problems but also generates more consistent concept-based explanations of classification output.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 65 of its 107 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2023.

Builds on

65 of 107 references.

References · 65

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  7. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  8. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  9. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  10. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  11. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  12. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
38 more
  1. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  2. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
  3. 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,423
  4. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  5. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  6. 2021Perceiver: General Perception with Iterative Attentioncited by 1,089
  7. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  8. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  9. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  10. 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 865
  11. 2016Pixel Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 814
  12. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  13. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
  14. 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 579
  15. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  16. 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 461
  17. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
  18. 2015Understanding Neural Networks Through Deep Visualizationcited by 332
  19. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
  20. 2020Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognitioncited by 273
  21. 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
  22. 2017Deep Learning for Case-Based Reasoning through Prototypes: A Neural Network that Explains Its Predictionscited by 234
  23. 2015Bilinear CNNs for Fine-grained Visual Recognitioncited by 228
  24. 2020Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 225
  25. 2019Recurrent Independent Mechanismscited by 219
  26. 2022MeMViT: Memory-Augmented Multiscale Vision Transformer for Efficient Long-Term Video Recognitioncited by 189
  27. 2016Synthesizing the preferred inputs for neurons in neural networks via deep generator networkscited by 181
  28. 2019Explaining Classifiers with Causal Concept Effect (CaCE)cited by 135
  29. 2021Deformable ProtoPNet: An Interpretable Image Classifier Using Deformable Prototypescited by 120
  30. 2014Part-based R-CNNs for Fine-grained Category Detectioncited by 107
  31. 2021Interpretable Image Classification with Differentiable Prototypes Assignmentcited by 97
  32. 2021Coordination Among Neural Modules Through a Shared Global Workspacecited by 83
  33. 2014The Application of Two-level Attention Models in Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Fine-grained Image Classificationcited by 67
  34. 2018Relational recurrent neural networkscited by 65
  35. 2022ProtoPFormer: Concentrating on Prototypical Parts in Vision Transformers for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 63
  36. 2015Part-Stacked CNN for Fine-Grained Visual Categorizationcited by 61
  37. 2022Concept Embedding Models: Beyond the Accuracy-Explainability Trade-Offcited by 61
  38. 2022Improving Object-centric Learning with Query Optimizationcited by 60

50 most cited of 65 All 65 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

7 papers.