mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Identification and Adaptive Control of Markov Jump Systems: Sample Complexity and Regret Bounds

arXiv 2111.07018 ↗First posted 13 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning how to effectively control unknown dynamical systems is crucial for intelligent autonomous systems. This task becomes a significant challenge when the underlying dynamics are changing with time. Motivated by this challenge, this paper considers the problem of controlling an unknown Markov jump linear system (MJS) to optimize a quadratic objective. By taking a model-based perspective, we consider identification-based adaptive control of MJSs. We first provide a system identification algorithm for MJS to learn the dynamics in each mode as well as the Markov transition matrix, underlying the evolution of the mode switches, from a single trajectory of the system states, inputs, and modes. Through martingale-based arguments, sample complexity of this algorithm is shown to be O(1/√T). We then propose an adaptive control scheme that performs system identification together with certainty equivalent control to adapt the controllers in an episodic fashion. Combining our sample complexity results with recent perturbation results for certainty equivalent control, we prove that when the episode lengths are appropriately chosen, the proposed adaptive control scheme achieves O(√T) regret, which can be improved to O(polylog(T)) with partial knowledge of the system. Our proof strategy introduces innovations to handle Markovian jumps and a weaker notion of stability common in MJSs. Our analysis provides insights into system theoretic quantities that affect learning accuracy and control performance. Numerical simulations are presented to further reinforce these insights.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2021.

Builds on

14 of 29 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 159
  2. 2018Learning Without Mixing: Towards A Sharp Analysis of Linear System Identificationcited by 158
  3. 2018Near optimal finite time identification of arbitrary linear dynamical systemscited by 89
  4. 2018Regret Bounds for Robust Adaptive Control of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 86
  5. 2018Non-asymptotic Identification of LTI Systems from a Single Trajectorycited by 78
  6. 2018Online Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 56
  7. 2020Logarithmic Regret Bound in Partially Observable Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 46
  8. 2020Logarithmic Regret for Learning Linear Quadratic Regulators Efficientlycited by 35
  9. 2020Efficient Optimistic Exploration in Linear-Quadratic Regulators via Lagrangian Relaxationcited by 18
  10. 2017Non-Asymptotic Analysis of Robust Control from Coarse-Grained Identificationcited by 16
  11. 2018Stochastic Gradient Descent Learns State Equations with Nonlinear Activationscited by 16
  12. 2020The Power of Linear Controllers in LQR Controlcited by 10
2 more
  1. 2019Mode Clustering for Markov Jump Systemscited by 4
  2. 2021Certainty Equivalent Quadratic Control for Markov Jump Systemscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 6; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort: