mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Impact of loss functions on the performance of a deep neural network designed to restore low-dose digital mammography

arXiv 2111.06890 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2021eess.IV cs.CV physics.med-phcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Digital mammography is still the most common imaging tool for breast cancer screening. Although the benefits of using digital mammography for cancer screening outweigh the risks associated with the x-ray exposure, the radiation dose must be kept as low as possible while maintaining the diagnostic utility of the generated images, thus minimizing patient risks. Many studies investigated the feasibility of dose reduction by restoring low-dose images using deep neural networks. In these cases, choosing the appropriate training database and loss function is crucial and impacts the quality of the results. In this work, a modification of the ResNet architecture, with hierarchical skip connections, is proposed to restore low-dose digital mammography. We compared the restored images to the standard full-dose images. Moreover, we evaluated the performance of several loss functions for this task. For training purposes, we extracted 256,000 image patches from a dataset of 400 images of retrospective clinical mammography exams, where different dose levels were simulated to generate low and standard-dose pairs. To validate the network in a real scenario, a physical anthropomorphic breast phantom was used to acquire real low-dose and standard full-dose images in a commercially avaliable mammography system, which were then processed through our trained model. An analytical restoration model for low-dose digital mammography, previously presented, was used as a benchmark in this work. Objective assessment was performed through the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and mean normalized squared error (MNSE), decomposed into residual noise and bias. Results showed that the perceptual loss function (PL4) is able to achieve virtually the same noise levels of a full-dose acquisition, while resulting in smaller signal bias compared to other loss functions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2021.

Builds on

17 of 65 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  6. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  7. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
  8. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,235
  9. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 919
  10. 2015Recent Advances in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 360
  11. 2017Low-Dose CT with a Residual Encoder-Decoder Convolutional Neural Network (RED-CNN)cited by 224
  12. 2017Low Dose CT Image Denoising Using a Generative Adversarial Network with Wasserstein Distance and Perceptual Losscited by 162
5 more
  1. 2017Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 162
  2. 2016A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low-dose X-ray CT reconstructioncited by 87
  3. 2018Can Deep Learning Outperform Modern Commercial CT Image Reconstruction Methods?cited by 54
  4. 2021Perceptual Image Quality Assessment with Transformerscited by 54
  5. 20183D Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Network for Low-Dose CT via Transfer Learning from a 2D Trained Networkcited by 47

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

2 papers.