mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ModelGuard: Runtime Validation of Lipschitz-continuous Models

arXiv 2104.15006 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2021eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents ModelGuard, a sampling-based approach to runtime model validation for Lipschitz-continuous models. Although techniques exist for the validation of many classes of models the majority of these methods cannot be applied to the whole of Lipschitz-continuous models, which includes neural network models. Additionally, existing techniques generally consider only white-box models. By taking a sampling-based approach, we can address black-box models, represented only by an input-output relationship and a Lipschitz constant. We show that by randomly sampling from a parameter space and evaluating the model, it is possible to guarantee the correctness of traces labeled consistent and provide a confidence on the correctness of traces labeled inconsistent. We evaluate the applicability and scalability of ModelGuard in three case studies, including a physical platform.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2021.

Builds on

7 of 18 references.

References · 7

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  2. 2018Regularisation of Neural Networks by Enforcing Lipschitz Continuitycited by 311
  3. 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 290
  4. 2018Verisig: verifying safety properties of hybrid systems with neural network controllerscited by 83
  5. 2018Scenic: A Language for Scenario Specification and Scene Generationcited by 79
  6. 2019Case Study: Verifying the Safety of an Autonomous Racing Car with a Neural Network Controllercited by 17
  7. 2020Data-Driven Model Invalidation for Unknown Lipschitz Continuous Systems via Abstractioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.