mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Solving the Class Imbalance Problem Using a Counterfactual Method for Data Augmentation

arXiv 2111.03516 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning from class imbalanced datasets poses challenges for many machine learning algorithms. Many real-world domains are, by definition, class imbalanced by virtue of having a majority class that naturally has many more instances than its minority class (e.g. genuine bank transactions occur much more often than fraudulent ones). Many methods have been proposed to solve the class imbalance problem, among the most popular being oversampling techniques (such as SMOTE). These methods generate synthetic instances in the minority class, to balance the dataset, performing data augmentations that improve the performance of predictive machine learning (ML) models. In this paper we advance a novel data augmentation method (adapted from eXplainable AI), that generates synthetic, counterfactual instances in the minority class. Unlike other oversampling techniques, this method adaptively combines exist-ing instances from the dataset, using actual feature-values rather than interpolating values between instances. Several experiments using four different classifiers and 25 datasets are reported, which show that this Counterfactual Augmentation method (CFA) generates useful synthetic data points in the minority class. The experiments also show that CFA is competitive with many other oversampling methods many of which are variants of SMOTE. The basis for CFAs performance is discussed, along with the conditions under which it is likely to perform better or worse in future tests.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2021.

Builds on

16 of 76 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  2. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  3. 2020Time Series Data Augmentation for Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 225
  4. 2020Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanationscited by 157
  5. 2020A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospectscited by 118
  6. 2019The Dangers of Post-hoc Interpretability: Unjustified Counterfactual Explanationscited by 97
  7. 2020Counterfactual Data Augmentation using Locally Factored Dynamicscited by 93
  8. 2021If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniquescited by 82
  9. 2016Understanding data augmentation for classification: when to warp?cited by 74
  10. 2020Instance-based Counterfactual Explanations for Time Series Classificationcited by 64
  11. 2021GeCo: Quality Counterfactual Explanations in Real Timecited by 32
  12. 2016Generalized Inverse Classificationcited by 22
4 more
  1. 2021A Few Good Counterfactuals: Generating Interpretable, Plausible and Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 19
  2. 2021Predicting Illness for a Sustainable Dairy Agriculture: Predicting and Explaining the Onset of Mastitis in Dairy Cowscited by 2
  3. 2021Handling Climate Change Using Counterfactuals: Using Counterfactuals in Data Augmentation to Predict Crop Growth in an Uncertain Climate Futurecited by 2
  4. 2020Counterfactual-based minority oversampling for imbalanced classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

8 papers.