mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hepatic vessel segmentation based on 3D swin-transformer with inductive biased multi-head self-attention

arXiv 2111.03368 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2021eess.IV cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: Segmentation of liver vessels from CT images is indispensable prior to surgical planning and aroused broad range of interests in the medical image analysis community. Due to the complex structure and low contrast background, automatic liver vessel segmentation remains particularly challenging. Most of the related researches adopt FCN, U-net, and V-net variants as a backbone. However, these methods mainly focus on capturing multi-scale local features which may produce misclassified voxels due to the convolutional operator's limited locality reception field. Methods: We propose a robust end-to-end vessel segmentation network called Inductive BIased Multi-Head Attention Vessel Net(IBIMHAV-Net) by expanding swin transformer to 3D and employing an effective combination of convolution and self-attention. In practice, we introduce the voxel-wise embedding rather than patch-wise embedding to locate precise liver vessel voxels, and adopt multi-scale convolutional operators to gain local spatial information. On the other hand, we propose the inductive biased multi-head self-attention which learns inductive biased relative positional embedding from initialized absolute position embedding. Based on this, we can gain a more reliable query and key matrix. To validate the generalization of our model, we test on samples which have different structural complexity. Results: We conducted experiments on the 3DIRCADb datasets. The average dice and sensitivity of the four tested cases were 74.8% and 77.5%, which exceed results of existing deep learning methods and improved graph cuts method. Conclusion: The proposed model IBIMHAV-Net provides an automatic, accurate 3D liver vessel segmentation with an interleaved architecture that better utilizes both global and local spatial features in CT volumes. It can be further extended for other clinical data.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2021.

Builds on

14 of 37 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  5. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  6. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,552
  7. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,471
  8. 2021Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,218
  9. 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 954
  10. 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 759
  11. 2018nnU-Net: Self-adapting Framework for U-Net-Based Medical Image Segmentationcited by 291
  12. 2021TransFuse: Fusing Transformers and CNNs for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 258
2 more
  1. 2021Convolution-Free Medical Image Segmentation using Transformerscited by 49
  2. 2020Learning Tubule-Sensitive CNNs for Pulmonary Airway and Artery-Vein Segmentation in CTcited by 28

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

7 papers.