Scanflow: A multi-graph framework for Machine Learning workflow management, supervision, and debugging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Learning (ML) is more than just training models, the whole workflow must be considered. Once deployed, a ML model needs to be watched and constantly supervised and debugged to guarantee its validity and robustness in unexpected situations. Debugging in ML aims to identify (and address) the model weaknesses in not trivial contexts. Several techniques have been proposed to identify different types of model weaknesses, such as bias in classification, model decay, adversarial attacks, etc., yet there is not a generic framework that allows them to work in a collaborative, modular, portable, iterative way and, more importantly, flexible enough to allow both human- and machine-driven techniques. In this paper, we propose a novel containerized directed graph framework to support and accelerate end-to-end ML workflow management, supervision, and debugging. The framework allows defining and deploying ML workflows in containers, tracking their metadata, checking their behavior in production, and improving the models by using both learned and human-provided knowledge. We demonstrate these capabilities by integrating in the framework two hybrid systems to detect data drift distribution which identify the samples that are far from the latent space of the original distribution, ask for human intervention, and whether retrain the model or wrap it with a filter to remove the noise of corrupted data at inference time. We test these systems on MNIST-C, CIFAR-10-C, and FashionMNIST-C datasets, obtaining promising accuracy results with the help of human involvement.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2021.
Builds on
29 of 49 references.
References · 29
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
- 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
17 more
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
- 2020Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning for Speech Recognitioncited by 496
- 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 369
- 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
- 2020The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligencecited by 194
- 2019MNIST-C: A Robustness Benchmark for Computer Visioncited by 137
- 2017The Consciousness Priorcited by 105
- 2018Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNISTcited by 104
- 2015Characterizing Concept Driftcited by 93
- 2019Black-Box Adversarial Attack with Transferable Model-based Embeddingcited by 57
- 2018DARCCC: Detecting Adversaries by Reconstruction from Class Conditional Capsulescited by 9
- 2018Assessing four Neural Networks on Handwritten Digit Recognition Dataset (MNIST)cited by 8
- 2020Model Extraction Attacks against Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2020On Interactive Machine Learning and the Potential of Cognitive Feedbackcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.