mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Assessing four Neural Networks on Handwritten Digit Recognition Dataset (MNIST)

arXiv 1811.08278 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2018cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although the image recognition has been a research topic for many years, many researchers still have a keen interest in it[1]. In some papers[2][3][4], however, there is a tendency to compare models only on one or two datasets, either because of time restraints or because the model is tailored to a specific task. Accordingly, it is hard to understand how well a certain model generalizes across image recognition field[6]. In this paper, we compare four neural networks on MNIST dataset[5] with different division. Among them, three are Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)[7], Deep Residual Network (ResNet)[2] and Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet)[3] respectively, and the other is our improvement on CNN baseline through introducing Capsule Network (CapsNet)[1] to image recognition area. We show that the previous models despite do a quite good job in this area, our retrofitting can be applied to get a better performance. The result obtained by CapsNet is an accuracy rate of 99.75%, and it is the best result published so far. Another inspiring result is that CapsNet only needs a small amount of data to get excellent performance. Finally, we will apply CapsNet's ability to generalize in other image recognition field in the future.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.

8 papers.