mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparative Study of Long Document Classification

arXiv 2111.00702 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2021cs.CL cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The amount of information stored in the form of documents on the internet has been increasing rapidly. Thus it has become a necessity to organize and maintain these documents in an optimum manner. Text classification algorithms study the complex relationships between words in a text and try to interpret the semantics of the document. These algorithms have evolved significantly in the past few years. There has been a lot of progress from simple machine learning algorithms to transformer-based architectures. However, existing literature has analyzed different approaches on different data sets thus making it difficult to compare the performance of machine learning algorithms. In this work, we revisit long document classification using standard machine learning approaches. We benchmark approaches ranging from simple Naive Bayes to complex BERT on six standard text classification datasets. We present an exhaustive comparison of different algorithms on a range of long document datasets. We re-iterate that long document classification is a simpler task and even basic algorithms perform competitively with BERT-based approaches on most of the datasets. The BERT-based models perform consistently well on all the datasets and can be blindly used for the document classification task when the computations cost is not a concern. In the shallow model's category, we suggest the usage of raw BiLSTM + Max architecture which performs decently across all the datasets. Even simpler Glove + Attention bag of words model can be utilized for simpler use cases. The importance of using sophisticated models is clearly visible in the IMDB sentiment dataset which is a comparatively harder task.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2021.

Builds on

16 of 31 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  2. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  3. 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,673
  4. 2020Reformer: The Efficient Transformercited by 1,658
  5. 2020Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexitycited by 1,462
  6. 2018Universal Sentence Encodercited by 485
  7. 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 428
  8. 2019Text Classification Algorithms: A Surveycited by 163
  9. 2019Hierarchical Transformers for Long Document Classificationcited by 103
  10. 2019DocBERT: BERT for Document Classificationcited by 68
  11. 2020Comparing BERT against traditional machine learning text classificationcited by 45
  12. 2016Sequential Short-Text Classification with Recurrent and Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 28
4 more
  1. 2020Deep Learning for Hindi Text Classification: A Comparisoncited by 22
  2. 2021Experimental Evaluation of Deep Learning models for Marathi Text Classificationcited by 19
  3. 2021Evaluating Deep Learning Approaches for Covid19 Fake News Detectioncited by 16
  4. 2021ShufText: A Simple Black Box Approach to Evaluate the Fragility of Text Classification Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

12 papers.