Interpreting Deep Knowledge Tracing Model on EdNet Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With more deep learning techniques being introduced into the knowledge tracing domain, the interpretability issue of the knowledge tracing models has aroused researchers' attention. Our previous study(Lu et al. 2020) on building and interpreting the KT model mainly adopts the ASSISTment dataset(Feng, Heffernan, and Koedinger 2009),, whose size is relatively small. In this work, we perform the similar tasks but on a large and newly available dataset, called EdNet(Choi et al. 2020). The preliminary experiment results show the effectiveness of the interpreting techniques, while more questions and tasks are worthy to be further explored and accomplished.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2021.
Builds on
6 of 20 references.
References · 6
- 2015Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 332
- 2016Dynamic Key-Value Memory Networks for Knowledge Tracingcited by 171
- 2019EdNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Dataset in Educationcited by 108
- 2019Deep-IRT: Make Deep Learning Based Knowledge Tracing Explainable Using Item Response Theorycited by 51
- 2018Deep Knowledge Tracing and Dynamic Student Classification for Knowledge Tracingcited by 23
- 2020Towards Interpretable Deep Learning Models for Knowledge Tracingcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024A Survey of Explainable Knowledge Tracingcited by 7
- 2024A Survey of Explainable Knowledge Tracing12 Mar 2024