Ensemble Federated Adversarial Training with Non-IID data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite federated learning endows distributed clients with a cooperative training mode under the premise of protecting data privacy and security, the clients are still vulnerable when encountering adversarial samples due to the lack of robustness. The adversarial samples can confuse and cheat the client models to achieve malicious purposes via injecting elaborate noise into normal input. In this paper, we introduce a novel Ensemble Federated Adversarial Training Method, termed as EFAT, that enables an efficacious and robust coupled training mechanism. Our core idea is to enhance the diversity of adversarial examples through expanding training data with different disturbances generated from other participated clients, which helps adversarial training perform well in Non-IID settings. Experimental results on different Non-IID situations, including feature distribution skew and label distribution skew, show that our proposed method achieves promising results compared with solely combining federated learning with adversarial approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2021.
Builds on
21 of 28 references.
References · 21
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,917
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
9 more
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2020Ensemble Distillation for Robust Model Fusion in Federated Learningcited by 682
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
- 2020Federated Learning with Matched Averagingcited by 564
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
- 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 314
- 2019Federated Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 140
- 2019Generative Models for Effective ML on Private, Decentralized Datasetscited by 85
- 2018Technical Report: When Does Machine Learning FAIL? Generalized Transferability for Evasion and Poisoning Attackscited by 81
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2022Towards Effective Clustered Federated Learning: A Peer-to-peer Framework with Adaptive Neighbor Matchingcited by 24
- 2024Adversarial Training: A Surveycited by 6
- 2024Logit Calibration and Feature Contrast for Robust Federated Learning on Non-IID Datacited by 4
- 2025A Client-level Assessment of Collaborative Backdoor Poisoning in Non-IID Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2025Hierarchical Dataset Selection for High-Quality Data Sharingcited by 0
- 2025Hierarchical Dataset Selection for High-Quality Data Sharing11 Dec 2025
- 2025A Client-level Assessment of Collaborative Backdoor Poisoning in Non-IID Federated Learning17 Apr 2025
- 2024Adversarial Training: A Survey19 Oct 2024
- 2024Logit Calibration and Feature Contrast for Robust Federated Learning on Non-IID Data10 Apr 2024
- 2022Towards Effective Clustered Federated Learning: A Peer-to-peer Framework with Adaptive Neighbor Matching23 Mar 2022