mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Local Effectiveness for Global robust training

arXiv 2110.14030 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite its popularity, deep neural networks are easily fooled. To alleviate this deficiency, researchers are actively developing new training strategies, which encourage models that are robust to small input perturbations. Several successful robust training methods have been proposed. However, many of them rely on strong adversaries, which can be prohibitively expensive to generate when the input dimension is high and the model structure is complicated. We adopt a new perspective on robustness and propose a novel training algorithm that allows a more effective use of adversaries. Our method improves the model robustness at each local ball centered around an adversary and then, by combining these local balls through a global term, achieves overall robustness. We demonstrate that, by maximizing the use of adversaries via focusing on local balls, we achieve high robust accuracy with weak adversaries. Specifically, our method reaches a similar robust accuracy level to the state of the art approaches trained on strong adversaries on MNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. As a result, the overall training time is reduced. Furthermore, when trained with strong adversaries, our method matches with the current state of the art on MNIST and outperforms them on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2021.

Builds on

26 of 29 references.

References · 26

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  5. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  6. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  7. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  8. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  9. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  10. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
  11. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
  12. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
14 more
  1. 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 293
  2. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
  3. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  4. 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
  5. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 214
  6. 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 175
  7. 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 172
  8. 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
  9. 2019Robust Learning with Jacobian Regularizationcited by 129
  10. 2020RayS: A Ray Searching Method for Hard-label Adversarial Attackcited by 96
  11. 2018Improving DNN Robustness to Adversarial Attacks using Jacobian Regularizationcited by 88
  12. 2019An Alternative Surrogate Loss for PGD-based Adversarial Testingcited by 45
  13. 2019Provable robustness against all adversarial lp-perturbations for p≥ 1cited by 39
  14. 2017Robustness of classifiers to universal perturbations: a geometric perspectivecited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.