mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Graph Representation of Person-specific Cognitive Processes from Audio-visual Behaviours for Automatic Personality Recognition

arXiv 2110.13570 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2021cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This approach builds on two following findings in cognitive science: (i) human cognition partially determines expressed behaviour and is directly linked to true personality traits; and (ii) in dyadic interactions individuals' nonverbal behaviours are influenced by their conversational partner behaviours. In this context, we hypothesise that during a dyadic interaction, a target subject's facial reactions are driven by two main factors, i.e. their internal (person-specific) cognitive process, and the externalised nonverbal behaviours of their conversational partner. Consequently, we propose to represent the target subjects (defined as the listener) person-specific cognition in the form of a person-specific CNN architecture that has unique architectural parameters and depth, which takes audio-visual non-verbal cues displayed by the conversational partner (defined as the speaker) as input, and is able to reproduce the target subject's facial reactions. Each person-specific CNN is explored by the Neural Architecture Search (NAS) and a novel adaptive loss function, which is then represented as a graph representation for recognising the target subject's true personality. Experimental results not only show that the produced graph representations are well associated with target subjects' personality traits in both human-human and human-machine interaction scenarios, and outperform the existing approaches with significant advantages, but also demonstrate that the proposed novel strategies such as adaptive loss, and the end-to-end vertices/edges feature learning, help the proposed approach in learning more reliable personality representations.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2021.

Builds on

26 of 105 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  2. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  3. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,089
  4. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,798
  5. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,499
  6. 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,143
  7. 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,101
  8. 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 837
  9. 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 680
  10. 2019Multimodal Transformer for Unaligned Multimodal Language Sequencescited by 645
  11. 2017Large-Scale Evolution of Image Classifierscited by 348
  12. 2017Residual Gated Graph ConvNetscited by 346
14 more
  1. 2016Designing Neural Network Architectures using Reinforcement Learningcited by 279
  2. 2018Neural Architecture Optimizationcited by 167
  3. 2017Genetic CNNcited by 124
  4. 2021Rethinking Architecture Selection in Differentiable NAScited by 92
  5. 2018DPP-Net: Device-aware Progressive Search for Pareto-optimal Neural Architecturescited by 40
  6. 2020EdgeNets:Edge Varying Graph Neural Networkscited by 36
  7. 2020Context-Aware Personality Inference in Dyadic Scenarios: Introducing the UDIVA Datasetcited by 31
  8. 2021Dyadformer: A Multi-modal Transformer for Long-Range Modeling of Dyadic Interactionscited by 16
  9. 2016Deep Impression: Audiovisual Deep Residual Networks for Multimodal Apparent Personality Trait Recognitioncited by 15
  10. 2018Generating Talking Face Landmarks from Speechcited by 15
  11. 2018PersEmoN: A Deep Network for Joint Analysis of Apparent Personality, Emotion and Their Relationshipcited by 15
  12. 2016Bi-modal First Impressions Recognition using Temporally Ordered Deep Audio and Stochastic Visual Featurescited by 13
  13. 2020GraphTCN: Spatio-Temporal Interaction Modeling for Human Trajectory Predictioncited by 12
  14. 2019On the Effect of Observed Subject Biases in Apparent Personality Analysis from Audio-visual Signalscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

5 papers.