mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dual Shape Guided Segmentation Network for Organs-at-Risk in Head and Neck CT Images

arXiv 2110.12192 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2021eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The accurate segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) in head and neck CT images is a critical step for radiation therapy of head and neck cancer patients. However, manual delineation for numerous OARs is time-consuming and laborious, even for expert oncologists. Moreover, manual delineation results are susceptible to high intra- and inter-variability. To this end, we propose a novel dual shape guided network (DSGnet) to automatically delineate nine important OARs in head and neck CT images. To deal with the large shape variation and unclear boundary of OARs in CT images, we represent the organ shape using an organ-specific unilateral inverse-distance map (UIDM) and guide the segmentation task from two different perspectives: direct shape guidance by following the segmentation prediction and across shape guidance by sharing the segmentation feature. In the direct shape guidance, the segmentation prediction is not only supervised by the true label mask, but also by the true UIDM, which is implemented through a simple yet effective encoder-decoder mapping from the label space to the distance space. In the across shape guidance, UIDM is used to facilitate the segmentation by optimizing the shared feature maps. For the experiments, we build a large head and neck CT dataset with a total of 699 images from different volunteers, and conduct comprehensive experiments and comparisons with other state-of-the-art methods to justify the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed method. The overall Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) value of 0.842 across the nine important OARs demonstrates great potential applications in improving the delineation quality and reducing the time cost.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2021.

Builds on

19 of 57 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  3. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  4. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  5. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  6. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  7. 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,483
  8. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,471
  9. 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,420
  10. 2019Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 258
  11. 2019Deep Learning for Segmentation using an Open Large-Scale Dataset in 2D Echocardiographycited by 243
  12. 2020MS-Net: Multi-Site Network for Improving Prostate Segmentation with Heterogeneous MRI Datacited by 121
7 more
  1. 2017DeepIGeoS: A Deep Interactive Geodesic Framework for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 110
  2. 2017Interactive Medical Image Segmentation using Deep Learning with Image-specific Fine-tuningcited by 110
  3. 2016DCAN: Deep Contour-Aware Networks for Accurate Gland Segmentationcited by 84
  4. 2014Multi-Atlas Segmentation of Biomedical Images: A Surveycited by 56
  5. 2019Shape-Aware Organ Segmentation by Predicting Signed Distance Mapscited by 41
  6. 2019FocusNet: Imbalanced Large and Small Organ Segmentation with an End-to-End Deep Neural Network for Head and Neck CT Imagescited by 24
  7. 2018Elastic Boundary Projection for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.