Safe rules for the identification of zeros in the solutions of the SLOPE problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper we propose a methodology to accelerate the resolution of the so-called "Sorted L-One Penalized Estimation" (SLOPE) problem. Our method leverages the concept of "safe screening", well-studied in the literature for textitgroup-separable sparsity-inducing norms, and aims at identifying the zeros in the solution of SLOPE. More specifically, we derive a set of (tfracn(n+1)2) inequalities for each element of the (n)-dimensional primal vector and prove that the latter can be safely screened if some subsets of these inequalities are verified. We propose moreover an efficient algorithm to jointly apply the proposed procedure to all the primal variables. Our procedure has a complexity (O(nlog n + LT)) where (T≤ n) is a problem-dependent constant and (L) is the number of zeros identified by the tests. Numerical experiments confirm that, for a prescribed computational budget, the proposed methodology leads to significant improvements of the solving precision.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2021.
Builds on
18 of 52 references.
References · 18
- 2016Gap Safe screening rules for sparsity enforcing penaltiescited by 38
- 2014SLOPE - Adaptive variable selection via convex optimizationcited by 33
- 2015Mind the duality gap: safer rules for the Lassocited by 31
- 2020Fast OSCAR and OWL Regression via Safe Screening Rulescited by 25
- 2014Screening Tests for Lasso Problemscited by 15
- 2019Algorithmic Analysis and Statistical Estimation of SLOPE via Approximate Message Passingcited by 14
- 2016Group SLOPE - adaptive selection of groups of predictorscited by 13
- 2013Safe Screening With Variational Inequalities and Its Application to LASSOcited by 11
- 2015The Alternating Descent Conditional Gradient Method for Sparse Inverse Problemscited by 11
- 2020The Geometry of Uniqueness, Sparsity and Clustering in Penalized Estimationcited by 9
- 2020The Strong Screening Rule for SLOPEcited by 8
- 2020Screening Rules and its Complexity for Active Set Identificationcited by 8
6 more
- 2021Expanding boundaries of Gap Safe screeningcited by 7
- 2019Safe squeezing for antisparse codingcited by 5
- 2018Solving the OSCAR and SLOPE Models Using a Semismooth Newton-Based Augmented Lagrangian Methodcited by 4
- 2021Screen & Relax: Accelerating the resolution of Elastic-net by safe identification of the solution supportcited by 4
- 2015An O(nlog(n)) Algorithm for Projecting Onto the Ordered Weighted ℓ1 Norm Ballcited by 2
- 2018Scalable Sparse Subspace Clustering via Ordered Weighted ℓ1 Regressioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2022Coordinate Descent for SLOPEcited by 4
- 2022Beyond GAP screening for Lasso by exploiting new dual cutting half-spaces with supplementary materialcited by 2
- 2023One to beat them all: "RYU" -- a unifying framework for the construction of safe ballscited by 2
- 2024Strong Screening Rules for Group-based SLOPE Modelscited by 2
- 2025Proximal Operators of Sorted Nonconvex Penaltiescited by 0
- 2025Efficient Solvers for SLOPE in R, Python, Julia, and C++cited by 0
- 2025Efficient Solvers for SLOPE in R, Python, Julia, and C++4 Nov 2025
- 2025Proximal Operators of Sorted Nonconvex Penalties18 Jun 2025
- 2024Strong Screening Rules for Group-based SLOPE Models24 May 2024
- 2023One to beat them all: "RYU" -- a unifying framework for the construction of safe balls1 Dec 2023
- 2022Coordinate Descent for SLOPE26 Oct 2022
- 2022Beyond GAP screening for Lasso by exploiting new dual cutting half-spaces with supplementary material2 Mar 2022