Safe Screening With Variational Inequalities and Its Application to LASSO
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse learning techniques have been routinely used for feature selection as the resulting model usually has a small number of non-zero entries. Safe screening, which eliminates the features that are guaranteed to have zero coefficients for a certain value of the regularization parameter, is a technique for improving the computational efficiency. Safe screening is gaining increasing attention since 1) solving sparse learning formulations usually has a high computational cost especially when the number of features is large and 2) one needs to try several regularization parameters to select a suitable model. In this paper, we propose an approach called "Sasvi" (Safe screening with variational inequalities). Sasvi makes use of the variational inequality that provides the sufficient and necessary optimality condition for the dual problem. Several existing approaches for Lasso screening can be casted as relaxed versions of the proposed Sasvi, thus Sasvi provides a stronger safe screening rule. We further study the monotone properties of Sasvi for Lasso, based on which a sure removal regularization parameter can be identified for each feature. Experimental results on both synthetic and real data sets are reported to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed Sasvi for Lasso screening.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2013.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Expanding boundaries of Gap Safe screeningcited by 7
- 2021Safe rules for the identification of zeros in the solutions of the SLOPE problemcited by 6
- 2022Safe Screening for Logistic Regression with ℓ0-ℓ2 Regularizationcited by 6
- 2021Dynamic Sasvi: Strong Safe Screening for Norm-Regularized Least Squarescited by 4
- 2023Generalized Low-Rank Update: Model Parameter Bounds for Low-Rank Training Data Modificationscited by 3
- 2021Screening for Sparse Online Learningcited by 2
- 2022Beyond GAP screening for Lasso by exploiting new dual cutting half-spaces with supplementary materialcited by 2
- 2023One to beat them all: "RYU" -- a unifying framework for the construction of safe ballscited by 2
- 2026Safe Distributionally Robust Feature Selection under Covariate Shiftcited by 1
- 2021Screening for a Reweighted Penalized Conditional Gradient Methodcited by 0
- 2023Safe Screening for Unbalanced Optimal Transportcited by 0
- 2026Safe Distributionally Robust Feature Selection under Covariate Shift17 Mar 2026
- 2023One to beat them all: "RYU" -- a unifying framework for the construction of safe balls1 Dec 2023
- 2023Safe Screening for Unbalanced Optimal Transport1 Jul 2023
- 2023Generalized Low-Rank Update: Model Parameter Bounds for Low-Rank Training Data Modifications22 Jun 2023
- 2022Beyond GAP screening for Lasso by exploiting new dual cutting half-spaces with supplementary material2 Mar 2022
- 2022Safe Screening for Logistic Regression with ℓ0-ℓ2 Regularization1 Feb 2022
- 2021Safe rules for the identification of zeros in the solutions of the SLOPE problem22 Oct 2021
- 2021Screening for a Reweighted Penalized Conditional Gradient Method2 Jul 2021
- 2021Expanding boundaries of Gap Safe screening22 Feb 2021
- 2021Dynamic Sasvi: Strong Safe Screening for Norm-Regularized Least Squares8 Feb 2021
- 2021Screening for Sparse Online Learning18 Jan 2021