mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Expanding boundaries of Gap Safe screening

arXiv 2102.10846 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2021cs.LG eess.SP math.OCcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse optimization problems are ubiquitous in many fields such as statistics, signal/image processing and machine learning. This has led to the birth of many iterative algorithms to solve them. A powerful strategy to boost the performance of these algorithms is known as safe screening: it allows the early identification of zero coordinates in the solution, which can then be eliminated to reduce the problem's size and accelerate convergence. In this work, we extend the existing Gap Safe screening framework by relaxing the global strong-concavity assumption on the dual cost function. Instead, we exploit local regularity properties, that is, strong concavity on well-chosen subsets of the domain. The non-negativity constraint is also integrated to the existing framework. Besides making safe screening possible to a broader class of functions that includes beta-divergences (e.g., the Kullback-Leibler divergence), the proposed approach also improves upon the existing Gap Safe screening rules on previously applicable cases (e.g., logistic regression). The proposed general framework is exemplified by some notable particular cases: logistic function, beta = 1.5 and Kullback-Leibler divergences. Finally, we showcase the effectiveness of the proposed screening rules with different solvers (coordinate descent, multiplicative-update and proximal gradient algorithms) and different data sets (binary classification, hyperspectral and count data).

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2021.

Builds on

13 of 57 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016Gap Safe screening rules for sparsity enforcing penaltiescited by 38
  2. 2015Mind the duality gap: safer rules for the Lassocited by 31
  3. 2014Nonlinear hyperspectral unmixing with robust nonnegative matrix factorizationcited by 16
  4. 2014Screening Tests for Lasso Problemscited by 15
  5. 2013Safe Screening With Variational Inequalities and Its Application to LASSOcited by 11
  6. 2014Dynamic Screening: Accelerating First-Order Algorithms for the Lasso and Group-Lassocited by 11
  7. 2016GAP Safe Screening Rules for Sparse-Group-Lassocited by 10
  8. 2014Two-Layer Feature Reduction for Sparse-Group Lasso via Decomposition of Convex Setscited by 7
  9. 2013Scaling SVM and Least Absolute Deviations via Exact Data Reductioncited by 5
  10. 2014Primal-Dual Algorithms for Non-negative Matrix Factorization with the Kullback-Leibler Divergencecited by 4
  11. 2018Safe Triplet Screening for Distance Metric Learningcited by 4
  12. 2017From safe screening rules to working sets for faster Lasso-type solverscited by 3
1 more
  1. 2018Stable safe screening and structured dictionaries for faster L1 regularizationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.