Deep Learning to Estimate Permeability using Geophysical Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) is a popular geophysical method to estimate three-dimensional (3D) permeability fields from electrical potential difference measurements. Traditional inversion and data assimilation methods are used to ingest this ERT data into hydrogeophysical models to estimate permeability. Due to ill-posedness and the curse of dimensionality, existing inversion strategies provide poor estimates and low resolution of the 3D permeability field. Recent advances in deep learning provide us with powerful algorithms to overcome this challenge. This paper presents a deep learning (DL) framework to estimate the 3D subsurface permeability from time-lapse ERT data. To test the feasibility of the proposed framework, we train DL-enabled inverse models on simulation data. Subsurface process models based on hydrogeophysics are used to generate this synthetic data for deep learning analyses. Results show that proposed weak supervised learning can capture salient spatial features in the 3D permeability field. Quantitatively, the average mean squared error (in terms of the natural log) on the strongly labeled training, validation, and test datasets is less than 0.5. The R2-score (global metric) is greater than 0.75, and the percent error in each cell (local metric) is less than 10%. Finally, an added benefit in terms of computational cost is that the proposed DL-based inverse model is at least O(104) times faster than running a forward model. Note that traditional inversion may require multiple forward model simulations (e.g., in the order of 10 to 1000), which are very expensive. This computational savings (O(105) - O(107)) makes the proposed DL-based inverse model attractive for subsurface imaging and real-time ERT monitoring applications due to fast and yet reasonably accurate estimations of the permeability field.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2021.
Builds on
18 of 103 references.
References · 18
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2018A Survey on Deep Transfer Learningcited by 417
- 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
- 2021Ensemble deep learning: A reviewcited by 283
- 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 260
- 2018Meta-Learning: A Surveycited by 254
- 2017Neural Style Transfer: A Reviewcited by 199
- 2020How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?cited by 193
- 2018Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learningcited by 80
- 2019What can be estimated? Identifiability, estimability, causal inference and ill-posed inverse problemscited by 11
- 2018Unsupervised Machine Learning Based on Non-Negative Tensor Factorization for Analyzing Reactive-Mixingcited by 7
6 more
- 2018Discovering state-parameter mappings in subsurface models using generative adversarial networkscited by 7
- 2021A deep learning modeling framework to capture mixing patterns in reactive-transport systemscited by 3
- 2021AdjointNet: Constraining machine learning models with physics-based codescited by 2
- 2016Sequential geophysical and flow inversion to characterize fracture networks in subsurface systemscited by 1
- 2016Regression-based reduced-order models to predict transient thermal output for enhanced geothermal systemscited by 1
- 2019PFLOTRAN-SIP: A PFLOTRAN Module for Simulating Spectral-Induced Polarization of Electrical Impedance Datacited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.