Learning First-Order Rules with Relational Path Contrast for Inductive Relation Reasoning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Relation reasoning in knowledge graphs (KGs) aims at predicting missing relations in incomplete triples, whereas the dominant paradigm is learning the embeddings of relations and entities, which is limited to a transductive setting and has restriction on processing unseen entities in an inductive situation. Previous inductive methods are scalable and consume less resource. They utilize the structure of entities and triples in subgraphs to own inductive ability. However, in order to obtain better reasoning results, the model should acquire entity-independent relational semantics in latent rules and solve the deficient supervision caused by scarcity of rules in subgraphs. To address these issues, we propose a novel graph convolutional network (GCN)-based approach for interpretable inductive reasoning with relational path contrast, named RPC-IR. RPC-IR firstly extracts relational paths between two entities and learns representations of them, and then innovatively introduces a contrastive strategy by constructing positive and negative relational paths. A joint training strategy considering both supervised and contrastive information is also proposed. Comprehensive experiments on three inductive datasets show that RPC-IR achieves outstanding performance comparing with the latest inductive reasoning methods and could explicitly represent logical rules for interpretability.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2021.
Builds on
16 of 30 references.
References · 16
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
- 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,101
- 2014Embedding Entities and Relations for Learning and Inference in Knowledge Basescited by 929
- 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 829
- 2017Convolutional 2D Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 729
- 2017DeepPath: A Reinforcement Learning Method for Knowledge Graph Reasoningcited by 265
- 2019Inductive Relation Prediction by Subgraph Reasoningcited by 237
- 2019Contrastive Learning of Structured World Modelscited by 206
4 more
- 2019DRUM: End-To-End Differentiable Rule Mining On Knowledge Graphscited by 173
- 2020RNNLogic: Learning Logic Rules for Reasoning on Knowledge Graphscited by 117
- 2020Communicative Message Passing for Inductive Relation Reasoningcited by 53
- 2016TensorLog: A Differentiable Deductive Databasecited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022A Survey of Knowledge Graph Reasoning on Graph Types: Static, Dynamic, and Multimodalcited by 106
- 2023Message Intercommunication for Inductive Relation Reasoningcited by 8
- 2023Inductive Relation Prediction from Relational Paths and Context with Hierarchical Transformerscited by 4
- 2024AMCEN: An Attention Masking-based Contrastive Event Network for Two-stage Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoningcited by 0
- 2025A Survey of Task-Oriented Knowledge Graph Reasoning: Status, Applications, and Prospectscited by 0
- 2025A Survey of Task-Oriented Knowledge Graph Reasoning: Status, Applications, and Prospects27 Apr 2025
- 2024AMCEN: An Attention Masking-based Contrastive Event Network for Two-stage Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoning16 May 2024
- 2023Message Intercommunication for Inductive Relation Reasoning23 May 2023
- 2023Inductive Relation Prediction from Relational Paths and Context with Hierarchical Transformers1 Apr 2023
- 2022A Survey of Knowledge Graph Reasoning on Graph Types: Static, Dynamic, and Multimodal12 Dec 2022