mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Metric Learning with Locality Sensitive Angular Loss for Self-Correcting Source Separation of Neural Spiking Signals

arXiv 2110.07046 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2021cs.LG q-bio.NCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neurophysiological time series, such as electromyographic signal and intracortical recordings, are typically composed of many individual spiking sources, the recovery of which can give fundamental insights into the biological system of interest or provide neural information for man-machine interfaces. For this reason, source separation algorithms have become an increasingly important tool in neuroscience and neuroengineering. However, in noisy or highly multivariate recordings these decomposition techniques often make a large number of errors, which degrades human-machine interfacing applications and often requires costly post-hoc manual cleaning of the output label set of spike timestamps. To address both the need for automated post-hoc cleaning and robust separation filters we propose a methodology based on deep metric learning, using a novel loss function which maintains intra-class variance, creating a rich embedding space suitable for both label cleaning and the discovery of new activations. We then validate this method with an artificially corrupted label set based on source-separated high-density surface electromyography recordings, recovering the original timestamps even in extreme degrees of feature and class-dependent label noise. This approach enables a neural network to learn to accurately decode neurophysiological time series using any imperfect method of labelling the signal.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2021.

Builds on

16 of 49 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  2. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  3. 2017In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identificationcited by 784
  4. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  5. 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
  6. 2017Sampling Matters in Deep Embedding Learningcited by 285
  7. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  8. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  9. 2019SoftTriple Loss: Deep Metric Learning Without Triplet Samplingcited by 163
  10. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  11. 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
  12. 2017Deep Metric Learning with Angular Losscited by 107
4 more
  1. 2019Ranked List Loss for Deep Metric Learningcited by 77
  2. 2017Learning with Average Top-k Losscited by 52
  3. 2015Metric Learning with Adaptive Density Discriminationcited by 40
  4. 2020Label Noise Types and Their Effects on Deep Learningcited by 29

Built on by

Not cited yet.