mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Parameterizing Activation Functions for Adversarial Robustness

arXiv 2110.05626 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.CVcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarially perturbed inputs. A commonly used defense is adversarial training, whose performance is influenced by model capacity. While previous works have studied the impact of varying model width and depth on robustness, the impact of increasing capacity by using learnable parametric activation functions (PAFs) has not been studied. We study how using learnable PAFs can improve robustness in conjunction with adversarial training. We first ask the question: how should we incorporate parameters into activation functions to improve robustness? To address this, we analyze the direct impact of activation shape on robustness through PAFs and observe that activation shapes with positive outputs on negative inputs and with high finite curvature can increase robustness. We combine these properties to create a new PAF, which we call Parametric Shifted Sigmoidal Linear Unit (PSSiLU). We then combine PAFs (including PReLU, PSoftplus and PSSiLU) with adversarial training and analyze robust performance. We find that PAFs optimize towards activation shape properties found to directly affect robustness. Additionally, we find that while introducing only 1-2 learnable parameters into the network, smooth PAFs can significantly increase robustness over ReLU. For instance, when trained on CIFAR-10 with additional synthetic data, PSSiLU improves robust accuracy by 4.54% over ReLU on ResNet-18 and 2.69% over ReLU on WRN-28-10 in the ℓ∞ threat model while adding only 2 additional parameters into the network architecture. The PSSiLU WRN-28-10 model achieves 61.96% AutoAttack accuracy, improving over the state-of-the-art robust accuracy on RobustBench (Croce et al., 2020).

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2021.

Builds on

39 of 52 references.

References · 39

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  8. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  9. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  10. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  11. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  12. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
27 more
  1. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  2. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
  3. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
  4. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
  5. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  6. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  7. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 459
  8. 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 439
  9. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  10. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
  11. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
  12. 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 201
  13. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
  14. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  15. 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 174
  16. 2021A Universal Law of Robustness via Isoperimetrycited by 150
  17. 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
  18. 2020Exactly Computing the Local Lipschitz Constant of ReLU Networkscited by 102
  19. 2020Training robust neural networks using Lipschitz boundscited by 98
  20. 2020Smooth Adversarial Trainingcited by 89
  21. 2017Efficient Defenses Against Adversarial Attackscited by 53
  22. 2019Intriguing properties of adversarial training at scalecited by 33
  23. 2021Low Curvature Activations Reduce Overfitting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 29
  24. 2020SPLASH: Learnable Activation Functions for Improving Accuracy and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 18
  25. 2018Defend Deep Neural Networks Against Adversarial Examples via Fixed and Dynamic Quantized Activation Functionscited by 17
  26. 2018Adversarial Defense via Data Dependent Activation Function and Total Variation Minimizationcited by 9
  27. 2016Suppressing the Unusual: towards Robust CNNs using Symmetric Activation Functionscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 10; 2023: 7; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

22 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022LAS-AT: Adversarial Training with Learnable Attack Strategycited by 94
  2. 2023How Deep Learning Sees the World: A Survey on Adversarial Attacks & Defensescited by 65
  3. 2022A Light Recipe to Train Robust Vision Transformerscited by 64
  4. 2023Robust Principles: Architectural Design Principles for Adversarially Robust CNNscited by 46
  5. 2022DISCO: Adversarial Defense with Local Implicit Functionscited by 33
  6. 2022Revisiting Residual Networks for Adversarial Robustness: An Architectural Perspectivecited by 28
  7. 2022Robust Models are less Over-Confidentcited by 25
  8. 2024MeanSparse: Post-Training Robustness Enhancement Through Mean-Centered Feature Sparsificationcited by 20
  9. 2022Adversarial Attack on Attackers: Post-Process to Mitigate Black-Box Score-Based Query Attackscited by 18
  10. 2023Defenses in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 14
  11. 2023Uncovering Adversarial Risks of Test-Time Adaptationcited by 12
  12. 2022Squeeze Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 10
10 more
  1. 2022Adversarial Robustness through the Lens of Convolutional Filterscited by 9
  2. 2023Fast Propagation is Better: Accelerating Single-Step Adversarial Training via Sampling Subnetworkscited by 8
  3. 2023RobArch: Designing Robust Architectures against Adversarial Attackscited by 6
  4. 2022Alternating Objectives Generates Stronger PGD-Based Adversarial Attackscited by 2
  5. 2023IRAD: Implicit Representation-driven Image Resampling against Adversarial Attackscited by 1
  6. 2024Exploring the Relationship: Transformative Adaptive Activation Functions in Comparison to Other Activation Functionscited by 1
  7. 2022Understanding Adversarial Robustness from Feature Maps of Convolutional Layerscited by 0
  8. 2025Studying Various Activation Functions and Non-IID Data for Machine Learning Model Robustnesscited by 0
  9. 2025Sample-wise Adaptive Weighting for Transfer Consistency in Adversarial Distillationcited by 0
  10. 2026NERO-Net: A Neuroevolutionary Approach for the Design of Adversarially Robust CNNscited by 0