Automated Aerial Animal Detection When Spatial Resolution Conditions Are Varied
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Knowing where livestock are located enables optimized management and mustering. However, Australian farms are large meaning that many of Australia's livestock are unmonitored which impacts farm profit, animal welfare and the environment. Effective animal localisation and counting by analysing satellite imagery overcomes this management hurdle however, high resolution satellite imagery is expensive. Thus, to minimise cost the lowest spatial resolution data that enables accurate livestock detection should be selected. In our work, we determine the association between object detector performance and spatial degradation for cattle, sheep and dogs. Accurate ground truth was established using high resolution drone images which were then downsampled to various ground sample distances (GSDs). Both circular and cassegrain aperture optics were simulated to generate point spread functions (PSFs) corresponding to various optical qualities. By simulating the PSF, rather than approximating it as a Gaussian, the images were accurately degraded to match the spatial resolution and blurring structure of satellite imagery. Two existing datasets were combined and used to train and test a YoloV5 object detection network. Detector performance was found to drop steeply around a GSD of 0.5m/px and was associated with PSF matrix structure within this GSD region. Detector mAP performance fell by 52 percent when a cassegrain, rather than circular, aperture was used at a 0.5m/px GSD. Overall blurring magnitude also had a small impact when matched to GSD, as did the internal network resolution. Our results here inform the selection of remote sensing data requirements for animal detection tasks, allowing farmers and ecologists to use more accessible medium resolution imagery with confidence.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2021.
Builds on
5 of 30 references.
References · 5
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2020Deep Unfolding Network for Image Super-Resolutioncited by 253
- 2018The Effects of Super-Resolution on Object Detection Performance in Satellite Imagerycited by 57
- 2018Detecting Mammals in UAV Images: Best Practices to address a substantially Imbalanced Dataset with Deep Learningcited by 27
- 2020Counting Cows: Tracking Illegal Cattle Ranching From High-Resolution Satellite Imagerycited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025Detection of Endangered Deer Species Using UAV Imagery: A Comparative Study Between Efficient Deep Learning Approachescited by 3
- 2025Efficient Endangered Deer Species Monitoring with UAV Aerial Imagery and Deep Learningcited by 2
- 2022Manipulating UAV Imagery for Satellite Model Training, Calibration and Testingcited by 0
- 2024Segmentation of arbitrary features in very high resolution remote sensing imagerycited by 0
- 2025Geofenced Unmanned Aerial Robotic Defender for Deer Detection and Deterrence (GUARD)cited by 0
- 2025Efficient Endangered Deer Species Monitoring with UAV Aerial Imagery and Deep Learning30 May 2025
- 2025Detection of Endangered Deer Species Using UAV Imagery: A Comparative Study Between Efficient Deep Learning Approaches30 May 2025
- 2025Geofenced Unmanned Aerial Robotic Defender for Deer Detection and Deterrence (GUARD)16 May 2025
- 2024Segmentation of arbitrary features in very high resolution remote sensing imagery20 Dec 2024
- 2022Manipulating UAV Imagery for Satellite Model Training, Calibration and Testing22 Mar 2022