mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Detection of Endangered Deer Species Using UAV Imagery: A Comparative Study Between Efficient Deep Learning Approaches

arXiv 2506.00154 ↗First posted 30 May 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study compares the performance of state-of-the-art neural networks including variants of the YOLOv11 and RT-DETR models for detecting marsh deer in UAV imagery, in scenarios where specimens occupy a very small portion of the image and are occluded by vegetation. We extend previous analysis adding precise segmentation masks for our datasets enabling a fine-grained training of a YOLO model with a segmentation head included. Experimental results show the effectiveness of incorporating the segmentation head achieving superior detection performance. This work contributes valuable insights for improving UAV-based wildlife monitoring and conservation strategies through scalable and accurate AI-driven detection systems.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.

Builds on

12 of 29 references.

References · 12

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  4. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  5. 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,477
  6. 2014Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognitioncited by 720
  7. 2023DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detectioncited by 533
  8. 2019YOLACT: Real-time Instance Segmentationcited by 443
  9. 2019CSPNet: A New Backbone that can Enhance Learning Capability of CNNcited by 381
  10. 2021An End-to-End Transformer Model for 3D Object Detectioncited by 329
  11. 2021Self-Supervised Pretraining and Controlled Augmentation Improve Rare Wildlife Recognition in UAV Imagescited by 5
  12. 2021Automated Aerial Animal Detection When Spatial Resolution Conditions Are Variedcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.