mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Visually Grounded Concept Composition

arXiv 2109.14115 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2021cs.CV cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate ways to compose complex concepts in texts from primitive ones while grounding them in images. We propose Concept and Relation Graph (CRG), which builds on top of constituency analysis and consists of recursively combined concepts with predicate functions. Meanwhile, we propose a concept composition neural network called Composer to leverage the CRG for visually grounded concept learning. Specifically, we learn the grounding of both primitive and all composed concepts by aligning them to images and show that learning to compose leads to more robust grounding results, measured in text-to-image matching accuracy. Notably, our model can model grounded concepts forming at both the finer-grained sentence level and the coarser-grained intermediate level (or word-level). Composer leads to pronounced improvement in matching accuracy when the evaluation data has significant compound divergence from the training data.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2021.

Builds on

28 of 34 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
  5. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  6. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
  7. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
  8. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  9. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  10. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  11. 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 375
  12. 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 369
16 more
  1. 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
  2. 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 280
  3. 2019UNITER: UNiversal Image-TExt Representation Learningcited by 225
  4. 2014Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Modelscited by 197
  5. 2018Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encodercited by 196
  6. 2020Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?cited by 147
  7. 2020Learning the Best Pooling Strategy for Visual Semantic Embeddingcited by 136
  8. 2018Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodologycited by 133
  9. 2020A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understandingcited by 108
  10. 2017Grounded Language Learning in a Simulated 3D Worldcited by 100
  11. 2017Gated-Attention Architectures for Task-Oriented Language Groundingcited by 72
  12. 2019Visually Grounded Neural Syntax Acquisitioncited by 48
  13. 2018Scene Graph Parsing as Dependency Parsingcited by 21
  14. 2017VSE++: Improving Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Hard Negativescited by 20
  15. 2020Learning to Represent Image and Text with Denotation Graphcited by 13
  16. 2019Is the Red Square Big? MALeViC: Modeling Adjectives Leveraging Visual Contextscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

5 papers.