mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Federated Deep Learning with Bayesian Privacy

arXiv 2109.13012 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) aims to protect data privacy by cooperatively learning a model without sharing private data among users. For Federated Learning of Deep Neural Network with billions of model parameters, existing privacy-preserving solutions are unsatisfactory. Homomorphic encryption (HE) based methods provide secure privacy protections but suffer from extremely high computational and communication overheads rendering it almost useless in practice . Deep learning with Differential Privacy (DP) was implemented as a practical learning algorithm at a manageable cost in complexity. However, DP is vulnerable to aggressive Bayesian restoration attacks as disclosed in the literature and demonstrated in experimental results of this work. To address the aforementioned perplexity, we propose a novel Bayesian Privacy (BP) framework which enables Bayesian restoration attacks to be formulated as the probability of reconstructing private data from observed public information. Specifically, the proposed BP framework accurately quantifies privacy loss by Kullback-Leibler (KL) Divergence between the prior distribution about the privacy data and the posterior distribution of restoration private data conditioning on exposed information}. To our best knowledge, this Bayesian Privacy analysis is the first to provides theoretical justification of secure privacy-preserving capabilities against Bayesian restoration attacks. As a concrete use case, we demonstrate that a novel federated deep learning method using private passport layers is able to simultaneously achieve high model performance, privacy-preserving capability and low computational complexity. Theoretical analysis is in accordance with empirical measurements of information leakage extensively experimented with a variety of DNN networks on image classification MNIST, CIFAR10, and CIFAR100 datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2021.

Builds on

18 of 35 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  3. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  4. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
  5. 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
  6. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 367
  7. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 320
  8. 2020SplitFed: When Federated Learning Meets Split Learningcited by 308
  9. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
  10. 2018Distributed learning of deep neural network over multiple agentscited by 277
  11. 2015Federated Optimization:Distributed Optimization Beyond the Datacentercited by 193
  12. 2019Deep Learning with Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 112
6 more
  1. 2020Provable Defense against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning from Representation Perspectivecited by 94
  2. 2019Hypothesis Testing Interpretations and Renyi Differential Privacycited by 84
  3. 2019[Extended version] Rethinking Deep Neural Network Ownership Verification: Embedding Passports to Defeat Ambiguity Attackscited by 82
  4. 2020Passport-aware Normalization for Deep Model Protectioncited by 42
  5. 2020Rethinking Privacy Preserving Deep Learning: How to Evaluate and Thwart Privacy Attackscited by 32
  6. 2017An Equivalence of Fully Connected Layer and Convolutional Layercited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 5; 2024: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: