mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantifying point cloud realism through adversarially learned latent representations

arXiv 2109.11775 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2021cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Judging the quality of samples synthesized by generative models can be tedious and time consuming, especially for complex data structures, such as point clouds. This paper presents a novel approach to quantify the realism of local regions in LiDAR point clouds. Relevant features are learned from real-world and synthetic point clouds by training on a proxy classification task. Inspired by fair networks, we use an adversarial technique to discourage the encoding of dataset-specific information. The resulting metric can assign a quality score to samples without requiring any task specific annotations. In a series of experiments, we confirm the soundness of our metric by applying it in controllable task setups and on unseen data. Additional experiments show reliable interpolation capabilities of the metric between data with varying degree of realism. As one important application, we demonstrate how the local realism score can be used for anomaly detection in point clouds.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2021.

Builds on

28 of 41 references.

References · 28

  1. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  2. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,384
  3. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  4. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  5. 2016Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 1,898
  6. 2016InfoGAN: Interpretable Representation Learning by Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Netscited by 858
  7. 2014Deep metric learning using Triplet networkcited by 421
  8. 2017Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Studycited by 267
  9. 2018Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measurescited by 224
  10. 2017VEEGAN: Reducing Mode Collapse in GANs using Implicit Variational Learningcited by 199
  11. 20193D Point Cloud Generative Adversarial Network Based on Tree Structured Graph Convolutionscited by 173
  12. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
16 more
  1. 2016Mode Regularized Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 123
  2. 2017PacGAN: The power of two samples in generative adversarial networkscited by 104
  3. 2016Disentangling factors of variation in deep representations using adversarial trainingcited by 87
  4. 2018An empirical study on evaluation metrics of generative adversarial networkscited by 81
  5. 2017DeLiGAN : Generative Adversarial Networks for Diverse and Limited Datacited by 77
  6. 2018Deep Generative Modeling of LiDAR Datacited by 70
  7. 2018On GANs and GMMscited by 62
  8. 2016Stacked Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 44
  9. 2017LR-GAN: Layered Recursive Generative Adversarial Networks for Image Generationcited by 36
  10. 2017AdaGAN: Boosting Generative Modelscited by 34
  11. 2019LiDAR Sensor modeling and Data augmentation with GANs for Autonomous drivingcited by 22
  12. 2016RenderGAN: Generating Realistic Labeled Datacited by 20
  13. 2018Gradient Reversal Against Discriminationcited by 20
  14. 2016Generating images with recurrent adversarial networkscited by 9
  15. 2019CNN-based synthesis of realistic high-resolution LiDAR datacited by 7
  16. 2018Decoupled Learning for Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

2 papers.