mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cross-linguistically Consistent Semantic and Syntactic Annotation of Child-directed Speech

arXiv 2109.10952 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2021cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper proposes a methodology for constructing such corpora of child directed speech (CDS) paired with sentential logical forms, and uses this method to create two such corpora, in English and Hebrew. The approach enforces a cross-linguistically consistent representation, building on recent advances in dependency representation and semantic parsing. Specifically, the approach involves two steps. First, we annotate the corpora using the Universal Dependencies (UD) scheme for syntactic annotation, which has been developed to apply consistently to a wide variety of domains and typologically diverse languages. Next, we further annotate these data by applying an automatic method for transducing sentential logical forms (LFs) from UD structures. The UD and LF representations have complementary strengths: UD structures are language-neutral and support consistent and reliable annotation by multiple annotators, whereas LFs are neutral as to their syntactic derivation and transparently encode semantic relations. Using this approach, we provide syntactic and semantic annotation for two corpora from CHILDES: Brown's Adam corpus (English; we annotate ~80% of its child-directed utterances), all child-directed utterances from Berman's Hagar corpus (Hebrew). We verify the quality of the UD annotation using an inter-annotator agreement study, and manually evaluate the transduced meaning representations. We then demonstrate the utility of the compiled corpora through (1) a longitudinal corpus study of the prevalence of different syntactic and semantic phenomena in the CDS, and (2) applying an existing computational model of language acquisition to the two corpora and briefly comparing the results across languages.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2021.

Builds on

9 of 73 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018AMR Dependency Parsing with a Typed Semantic Algebracited by 17
  2. 2020Treebanking User-Generated Content: a UD Based Overview of Guidelines, Corpora and Unified Recommendationscited by 13
  3. 2016Universal Dependencies for Learner Englishcited by 11
  4. 2019All Roads Lead to UD: Converting Stanford and Penn Parses to English Universal Dependencies with Multilayer Annotationscited by 9
  5. 2021Probabilistic, Structure-Aware Algorithms for Improved Variety, Accuracy, and Coverage of AMR Alignmentscited by 9
  6. 2017BKTreebank: Building a Vietnamese Dependency Treebankcited by 4
  7. 2019Content Differences in Syntactic and Semantic Representationscited by 4
  8. 2021Coordinate Constructions in English Enhanced Universal Dependencies: Analysis and Computational Modelingcited by 4
  9. 2019An Improved Approach for Semantic Graph Composition with CCGcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

3 papers.