mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Treebanking User-Generated Content: a UD Based Overview of Guidelines, Corpora and Unified Recommendations

arXiv 2011.02063 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2020cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This article presents a discussion on the main linguistic phenomena which cause difficulties in the analysis of user-generated texts found on the web and in social media, and proposes a set of annotation guidelines for their treatment within the Universal Dependencies (UD) framework of syntactic analysis. Given on the one hand the increasing number of treebanks featuring user-generated content, and its somewhat inconsistent treatment in these resources on the other, the aim of this article is twofold: (1) to provide a condensed, though comprehensive, overview of such treebanks -- based on available literature -- along with their main features and a comparative analysis of their annotation criteria, and (2) to propose a set of tentative UD-based annotation guidelines, to promote consistent treatment of the particular phenomena found in these types of texts. The overarching goal of this article is to provide a common framework for researchers interested in developing similar resources in UD, thus promoting cross-linguistic consistency, which is a principle that has always been central to the spirit of UD.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort: