mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Assessments of epistemic uncertainty using Gaussian stochastic weight averaging for fluid-flow regression

arXiv 2109.08248 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2021physics.flu-dyn cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We use Gaussian stochastic weight averaging (SWAG) to assess the model-form uncertainty associated with neural-network-based function approximation relevant to fluid flows. SWAG approximates a posterior Gaussian distribution of each weight, given training data, and a constant learning rate. Having access to this distribution, it is able to create multiple models with various combinations of sampled weights, which can be used to obtain ensemble predictions. The average of such an ensemble can be regarded as the `mean estimation', whereas its standard deviation can be used to construct `confidence intervals', which enable us to perform uncertainty quantification (UQ) with regard to the training process of neural networks. We utilize representative neural-network-based function approximation tasks for the following cases: (i) a two-dimensional circular-cylinder wake; (ii) the DayMET dataset (maximum daily temperature in North America); (iii) a three-dimensional square-cylinder wake; and (iv) urban flow, to assess the generalizability of the present idea for a wide range of complex datasets. SWAG-based UQ can be applied regardless of the network architecture, and therefore, we demonstrate the applicability of the method for two types of neural networks: (i) global field reconstruction from sparse sensors by combining convolutional neural network (CNN) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP); and (ii) far-field state estimation from sectional data with two-dimensional CNN. We find that SWAG can obtain physically-interpretable confidence-interval estimates from the perspective of model-form uncertainty. This capability supports its use for a wide range of problems in science and engineering.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2021.

Builds on

17 of 94 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  3. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
  4. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
  5. 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
  6. 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
  7. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
  8. 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent as Approximate Bayesian Inferencecited by 298
  9. 2015Probabilistic Backpropagation for Scalable Learning of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 295
  10. 2019Prediction of Aerodynamic Flow Fields Using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 144
  11. 2018The Unusual Effectiveness of Averaging in GAN Trainingcited by 73
  12. 2021Global field reconstruction from sparse sensors with Voronoi tessellation-assisted deep learningcited by 55
5 more
  1. 2020Convolutional-network models to predict wall-bounded turbulence from wall quantitiescited by 46
  2. 2021Towards extraction of orthogonal and parsimonious non-linear modes from turbulent flowscited by 44
  3. 2019SWALP : Stochastic Weight Averaging in Low-Precision Trainingcited by 40
  4. 2017Application of Convolutional Neural Network to Predict Airfoil Lift Coefficientcited by 26
  5. 2020An advanced hybrid deep adversarial autoencoder for parameterized nonlinear fluid flow modellingcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Super-Resolution Analysis via Machine Learning: A Survey for Fluid Flowscited by 30
  2. 2024LUCIE: A Lightweight Uncoupled ClImate Emulator with long-term stability and physical consistency for O(1000)-member ensemblescited by 30
  3. 2023Bayesian Conditional Diffusion Models for Versatile Spatiotemporal Turbulence Generationcited by 28
  4. 2023Uncertainty-aware Surrogate Models for Airfoil Flow Simulations with Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 22
  5. 2024Data-Driven Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Digital Twin Perspectivecited by 12
  6. 2025Multimodal Atmospheric Super-Resolution With Deep Generative Modelscited by 8
  7. 2023Interpretable A-posteriori Error Indication for Graph Neural Network Surrogate Modelscited by 6
  8. 2023Quantifying uncertainty for deep learning based forecasting and flow-reconstruction using neural architecture search ensemblescited by 5
  9. 2024Enhancing Graph U-Nets for Mesh-Agnostic Spatio-Temporal Flow Predictioncited by 4
  10. 2025Introducing Interval Neural Networks for Uncertainty-Aware System Identificationcited by 3
  11. 2025Multi-resolution Physics-Aware Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network for Complex Flowscited by 1
  12. 2022Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (convLSTM) for Spatio-Temporal Forecastings of Saturations and Pressure in the SACROC Fieldcited by 0
3 more
  1. 2024Reducing Spatial Discretization Error on Coarse CFD Simulations Using an OpenFOAM-Embedded Deep Learning Frameworkcited by 0
  2. 2026Bayesian Generative Adversarial Networks via Gaussian Approximation for Tabular Data Synthesiscited by 0
  3. 2026Beyond Prediction: Interval Neural Networks for Uncertainty-Aware System Identificationcited by 0