mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Algorithmic Question Answering: Towards a Compositionally Hybrid AI for Algorithmic Reasoning

arXiv 2109.08006 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2021cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An important aspect of artificial intelligence (AI) is the ability to reason in a step-by-step "algorithmic" manner that can be inspected and verified for its correctness. This is especially important in the domain of question answering (QA). We argue that the challenge of algorithmic reasoning in QA can be effectively tackled with a "systems" approach to AI which features a hybrid use of symbolic and sub-symbolic methods including deep neural networks. Additionally, we argue that while neural network models with end-to-end training pipelines perform well in narrow applications such as image classification and language modelling, they cannot, on their own, successfully perform algorithmic reasoning, especially if the task spans multiple domains. We discuss a few notable exceptions and point out how they are still limited when the QA problem is widened to include other intelligence-requiring tasks. However, deep learning, and machine learning in general, do play important roles as components in the reasoning process. We propose an approach to algorithm reasoning for QA, Deep Algorithmic Question Answering (DAQA), based on three desirable properties: interpretability, generalizability, and robustness which such an AI system should possess, and conclude that they are best achieved with a combination of hybrid and compositional AI.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2021.

Builds on

25 of 46 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
  5. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  6. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 630
  7. 2019Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLogcited by 389
  8. 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 388
  9. 2014Memory Networkscited by 354
  10. 2017A simple neural network module for relational reasoningcited by 345
  11. 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
  12. 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 195
13 more
  1. 2017Inferring and Executing Programs for Visual Reasoningcited by 130
  2. 2015Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networkscited by 127
  3. 2020Logical Neural Networkscited by 118
  4. 2016Neural Symbolic Machines: Learning Semantic Parsers on Freebase with Weak Supervisioncited by 101
  5. 2020Graph Neural Networks Meet Neural-Symbolic Computing: A Survey and Perspectivecited by 93
  6. 2021Neural Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 92
  7. 2016Learning to Compose Neural Networks for Question Answeringcited by 85
  8. 2018Relational recurrent neural networkscited by 65
  9. 2017Thinking Fast and Slow: Optimization Decomposition Across Timescalescited by 60
  10. 2020Neural-Symbolic Integration: A Compositional Perspectivecited by 45
  11. 2016Differentiable Programs with Neural Librariescited by 30
  12. 2020Symbolic Logic meets Machine Learning: A Brief Survey in Infinite Domainscited by 16
  13. 2019Integrating Knowledge and Reasoning in Image Understandingcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

2 papers.