MPC-Friendly Commitments for Publicly Verifiable Covert Security
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We address the problem of efficiently verifying a commitment in a two-party computation. This addresses the scenario where a party P1 commits to a value x to be used in a subsequent secure computation with another party P2 that wants to receive assurance that P1 did not cheat, i.e. that x was indeed the value inputted into the secure computation. Our constructions operate in the publicly verifiable covert (PVC) security model, which is a relaxation of the malicious model of MPC appropriate in settings where P1 faces a reputational harm if caught cheating. We introduce the notion of PVC commitment scheme and indexed hash functions to build commitments schemes tailored to the PVC framework, and propose constructions for both arithmetic and Boolean circuits that result in very efficient circuits. From a practical standpoint, our constructions for Boolean circuits are 60× faster to evaluate securely, and use 36× less communication than baseline methods based on hashing. Moreover, we show that our constructions are tight in terms of required non-linear operations, by proving lower bounds on the nonlinear gate count of commitment verification circuits. Finally, we present a technique to amplify the security properties our constructions that allows to efficiently recover malicious guarantees with statistical security.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2021.
Builds on
14 of 52 references.
References · 14
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
- 2017Explaining How a Deep Neural Network Trained with End-to-End Learning Steers a Carcited by 65
- 2017SafetyNets: Verifiable Execution of Deep Neural Networks on an Untrusted Cloudcited by 50
- 2018Blind Justice: Fairness with Encrypted Sensitive Attributescited by 41
- 2019QUOTIENT: Two-Party Secure Neural Network Training and Predictioncited by 41
- 2020Fairness in the Eyes of the Data: Certifying Machine-Learning Modelscited by 16
- 2019Practical Solutions for Machine Learning Safety in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.