mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Characterization and Mitigation of Insufficiencies in Automated Driving Systems

arXiv 2404.09557 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2024cs.RO cs.AI cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated Driving (AD) systems have the potential to increase safety, comfort and energy efficiency. Recently, major automotive companies have started testing and validating AD systems (ADS) on public roads. Nevertheless, the commercial deployment and wide adoption of ADS have been moderate, partially due to system functional insufficiencies (FI) that undermine passenger safety and lead to hazardous situations on the road. FIs are defined in ISO 21448 Safety Of The Intended Functionality (SOTIF). FIs are insufficiencies in sensors, actuators and algorithm implementations, including neural networks and probabilistic calculations. Examples of FIs in ADS include inaccurate ego-vehicle localization on the road, incorrect prediction of a cyclist maneuver, unreliable detection of a pedestrian, etc. The main goal of our study is to formulate a generic architectural design pattern, which is compatible with existing methods and ADS, to improve FI mitigation and enable faster commercial deployment of ADS. First, we studied the 2021 autonomous vehicles disengagement reports published by the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). The data clearly show that disengagements are five times more often caused by FIs rather than by system faults. We then made a comprehensive list of insufficiencies and their characteristics by analyzing over 10 hours of publicly available road test videos. In particular, we identified insufficiency types in four major categories: world model, motion plan, traffic rule, and operational design domain. The insufficiency characterization helps making the SOTIF analyses of triggering conditions more systematic and comprehensive. Based on our FI characterization, simulation experiments and literature survey, we define a novel generic architectural design pattern Daruma to dynamically select the channel that is least likely to have a FI at the moment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2024.

Builds on

7 of 42 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2019Human Motion Trajectory Prediction: A Surveycited by 231
  3. 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 129
  4. 2021Detecting Multi-Sensor Fusion Errors in Advanced Driver-Assistance Systemscited by 8
  5. 2019Architecting Safety Supervisors for High Levels of Automated Drivingcited by 3
  6. 2016Efficient Stochastic Inference of Bitwise Deep Neural Networkscited by 1
  7. 2023Discovery of Perception Performance Limiting Triggering Conditions in Automated Drivingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Output Type Before Quality: A Standards-Derived XAI Admissibility Rubric for Autonomous-Driving Safety
  2. 2025Safety2Drive: Safety-Critical Scenario Benchmark for the Evaluation of Autonomous Driving
  3. 2025Argus: Resilience-Oriented Safety Assurance Framework for End-to-End ADSs
  4. 2026Real-World Perturbation Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems
  5. 2022Rationale-aware Autonomous Driving Policy utilizing Safety Force Field implemented on CARLA Simulator
  6. 2025Advancing Autonomous Driving System Testing: Demands, Challenges, and Future Directions
  7. 2025A Concept for Efficient Scalability of Automated Driving Allowing for Technical, Legal, Cultural, and Ethical Differences
  8. 2026Operating Within the Operational Design Domain: Zero-Shot Perception with Vision-Language Models