PAC Mode Estimation using PPR Martingale Confidence Sequences
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of correctly identifying the textitmode of a discrete distribution P with sufficiently high probability by observing a sequence of i.i.d. samples drawn from P. This problem reduces to the estimation of a single parameter when P has a support set of size K = 2. After noting that this special case is tackled very well by prior-posterior-ratio (PPR) martingale confidence sequences citepwaudby-ramdas-ppr, we propose a generalisation to mode estimation, in which P may take K ≥ 2 values. To begin, we show that the "one-versus-one" principle to generalise from K = 2 to K ≥ 2 classes is more efficient than the "one-versus-rest" alternative. We then prove that our resulting stopping rule, denoted PPR-1v1, is asymptotically optimal (as the mistake probability is taken to 0). PPR-1v1 is parameter-free and computationally light, and incurs significantly fewer samples than competitors even in the non-asymptotic regime. We demonstrate its gains in two practical applications of sampling: election forecasting and verification of smart contracts in blockchains.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2021.
Builds on
7 of 29 references.
References · 7
- 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
- 2013lil' UCB : An Optimal Exploration Algorithm for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 148
- 2018Mixture Martingales Revisited with Applications to Sequential Tests and Confidence Intervalscited by 76
- 2020Confidence sequences for sampling without replacementcited by 23
- 2015Sample Complexity for Winner Prediction in Electionscited by 7
- 2019Sequential Mode Estimation with Oracle Queriescited by 5
- 2018YODA: Enabling computationally intensive contracts on blockchains with Byzantine and Selfish nodescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025Optimal Self-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2026Optimal Bayesian Stopping for Efficient Inference of Consistent LLM Answerscited by 7
- 2023Identifying Copeland Winners in Dueling Bandits with Indifferencescited by 0
- 2026Strategic Self-Consistencycited by 0
- 2026Adaptive Self-Consistency: From Black-Box Sampling to Distribution-Valued Feedbackcited by 0
- 2026Adaptive Self-Consistency: From Black-Box Sampling to Distribution-Valued Feedback30 Sep 2026
- 2026Strategic Self-Consistency24 Sep 2026
- 2026Optimal Bayesian Stopping for Efficient Inference of Consistent LLM Answers5 Feb 2026
- 2025Optimal Self-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning with Large Language Models15 Nov 2025
- 2023Identifying Copeland Winners in Dueling Bandits with Indifferences1 Oct 2023